2014
DOI: 10.2495/978-1-84564-908-1/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode succession in a public transit corridor

Abstract: Introduction to the Model 4. 1.1 The Passenger Demand 4.1.2 Model Assumptions 4.1.3 Travel Time 4.1.4 Passenger Travel Time Cost 4.1.5 Passenger Waiting Time Cost 4.1.6 Dispatching Cost 4.1.7 Total Cost 4.2 The Calculation of the Optimum Headways 4.2.1 Proof of the "Minimum" 4.2.2 Equal Headways 4.2.3 Conditional Requirement of Passengers per Bus and Bus Capacity 4.2.4 Optimal Fleet for Combined Regular/Express Bus Operation 4.3 Numerical Example 4.4 Combinations of Scheduled and Unscheduled, Regular and Expre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these and other studies, local users often associate a tram system with better management, which in a number of studies cited below, has proved to be an important factor in mode choice. Customer experience factors figure prominently in the decisions to replace or augment existing roadbased public transit [7]. However, such positive perceptions of rail may be highly conditioned by public involvement in the decision [8].…”
Section: Public Preference For the Trammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these and other studies, local users often associate a tram system with better management, which in a number of studies cited below, has proved to be an important factor in mode choice. Customer experience factors figure prominently in the decisions to replace or augment existing roadbased public transit [7]. However, such positive perceptions of rail may be highly conditioned by public involvement in the decision [8].…”
Section: Public Preference For the Trammentioning
confidence: 99%