1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-60413-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Aided Diagnosis of Mechanical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9], is based on an approximation of the change of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors (due to the damage) by a linear Taylor expansion depending on the correction parameters Da j :…”
Section: Inverse Eigensensitivity Methods (Iesm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9], is based on an approximation of the change of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors (due to the damage) by a linear Taylor expansion depending on the correction parameters Da j :…”
Section: Inverse Eigensensitivity Methods (Iesm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A greater number of places where the signal is recorded, results in wider possibilities to make conclusions in relation to the whole object (Dąbrowski et al, 2007a). However, not always the increase in number of measuring points is purposeful, since it inevitably leads to an uncontrolled increase in the number of obtained information, whose multidimensionality will result in small usefulness in implementation of established goals (Natke, Cempel, 1997). During the analysis of mutual relations, each subsequent recorded signal increases dimensionality of observation space, which consequently leads to information chaos (Bolc et al, 1991).…”
Section: Comments On the Use Of Vibroacoustic Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, we should determine the symptom limit value S l which enables us to do this safely. This limit value can base on some experimental practice, some standards (e.g., ISO), or it can be assessed by the new concept of symptom reliability R(S) (Natke, 1997;Cempel, 2000). Figure 7 shows this possibility of assessing the symptom limit value S l (the bottom-right panel), combined with another possibility of optimizing the dimension of the primary symptom observation space.…”
Section: Examples Of Simple and Advanced Svd Decomposition Of Real DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of singular value decomposition (SVD) to this set of diagnostic data enables us to observe the evolution of a few generalized faults of the diagnosed machine, starting from the fault of maximal severity. Applying next the concept of symptom reliability (Cempel et al 2000;Natke et al 1997;Cempel, 1991) to the so extracted generalized fault symptoms, one can calculate the symptom limit value S l , the basis for any diagnostic decision. However, the loadings of machines by production processes (or the environment) are not constant, so that the resulting symptom readings may have some disturbances influencing the assessment of the machine condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%