2015
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.13321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in CT Enterography

Abstract: Low-dose CT enterography with MBIR yields images that are comparable to or superior to conventional images.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Technical and anthropomorphic phantoms provide a safe, objective and reproducible method of assessing the image quality of different reconstruction algorithms over a range of radiation dose levels. Preliminary phantom experiments with MBIR report a significant reduction in image noise and streak artefact, with significant improvements in image quality compared to FBP and ASIR …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Technical and anthropomorphic phantoms provide a safe, objective and reproducible method of assessing the image quality of different reconstruction algorithms over a range of radiation dose levels. Preliminary phantom experiments with MBIR report a significant reduction in image noise and streak artefact, with significant improvements in image quality compared to FBP and ASIR …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, patient studies to assess the performance of reconstruction algorithms at different dose levels can often be problematic to implement, as imaging large numbers of patients at different dose settings introduces confounding factors in addition to ethical challenges. To date, clinical studies assessing the use of MBIR in abdominopelvic CT are limited …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There have been huge strides made recently in the attempts to reduce the radiation exposure to patients from CT. Dose reduction techniques include automatic tube current modulation [ 63 ], truncated protocols with fewer images [ 64 ], increasing acceptable image noise [ 65 ], reduced mA and kV scanning, and clinical use of new iterative reconstruction techniques [ 66 , 67 ]. There is a fine balance to be struck between reducing individual patient radiation exposure and maintaining sufficient image quality to allow an accurate diagnosis to be made, and this is an area of intensive research.…”
Section: Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%