2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.110952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model development for soluble solids and lycopene contents of cherry tomato at different temperatures using near-infrared spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only report to our knowledge available for lycopene quantification in tomatoes using a handheld Raman spectrometer (1064 nm) has showed an R 2 of 0.88 in their regression model, with no error value or external validation data set reported [ 46 ]. Sheng et al, [ 47 ] reported on a non-destructive method for lycopene determination in cherry tomatoes, with a lycopene concentration of 7.51 ± 1.27 mg/100 g, using portable NIR spectroscopy, reporting a correlation coefficient of 0.80 and SEP of 0.74 mg/100 g. Our data set had a wider lycopene range and comprised different types of tomatoes, including round, Roma, cherry, and grape tomatoes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only report to our knowledge available for lycopene quantification in tomatoes using a handheld Raman spectrometer (1064 nm) has showed an R 2 of 0.88 in their regression model, with no error value or external validation data set reported [ 46 ]. Sheng et al, [ 47 ] reported on a non-destructive method for lycopene determination in cherry tomatoes, with a lycopene concentration of 7.51 ± 1.27 mg/100 g, using portable NIR spectroscopy, reporting a correlation coefficient of 0.80 and SEP of 0.74 mg/100 g. Our data set had a wider lycopene range and comprised different types of tomatoes, including round, Roma, cherry, and grape tomatoes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Table 4, it was shown that PLS gave optimum results compared to other method since the RMSE value was the smallest. Generally, the larger the correlation coefficient, the smaller the root mean square error, and it indicates that the overall performance of the model is better [39]. It could be said that the lycopene content in high soluble solids of tomato fruits (grown under water stress treatment) after storage was best determined using PLS analysis with Visible/Near-infrared Spectroscopy non-destructively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As early as 20 years ago, Slaughter, Barrett, and Boersig (1996) and Peiris, Dull, Leffler, and Kays (1998) demonstrated the feasibility of using this spectroscopy to detect soluble solids content in fresh tomatoes. Later, this technique was also used to detect firmness (Feng, Zhang, Adhikari, & Guo, 2019), pH, total sugar (Tiwari et al, 2013), total acid (Pedro & Ferreira, 2007), lycopene contents (Sheng et al, 2019), and so forth. However, the conventional Vis–NIRS only can measure a specific small area (or point) without providing spatial information of the tested object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%