1987
DOI: 10.1063/1.98996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model for bulk effects on Si interstitial diffusivity in silicon

Abstract: Literature values for the diffusivity of the silicon interstitial or interstitialcy, I, range over several orders of magnitude and have activation energies between 1 and 4 eV. We propose a model for bulk trapping effects on the I diffusivity which provides a consistent explanation for the observed discrepancies. It reconciles the effects of different materials (float-zone, Czochralski, and epitaxial silicon) and processes (diffusion and gettering) on the apparent value of the I diffusivity. New experimental re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

1988
1988
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the diffusion range of interstitials in Si superlattices grown by chemical-vapor deposition has been shown to be much larger than in MBE-grown Si. 27 This discrepancy between the various experiments has been ascribed to the fact that the migration of self-interstitials is perturbed by the presence of interstitial traps in Si, 18,19 and presumably C is the dominant impurity as demonstrated above.…”
Section: B Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the diffusion range of interstitials in Si superlattices grown by chemical-vapor deposition has been shown to be much larger than in MBE-grown Si. 27 This discrepancy between the various experiments has been ascribed to the fact that the migration of self-interstitials is perturbed by the presence of interstitial traps in Si, 18,19 and presumably C is the dominant impurity as demonstrated above.…”
Section: B Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Separate determinations of D I and ͓I*͔, 15 on the other hand, have resulted in an enormous spread in these parameters. As suggested by Griffin et al 18 and by Cowern 19 the discrepancies in the values for D I could be explained on the basis of trap-limited interstitial diffusion; however, no consensus has been reached until now about the nature of these intrinsic traps in silicon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notice that all these values are within those reported by other authors. For example, Taniguchi et al [10] performing an experiment on thinned silicon wafers, but using conventional thermal oxidation at 1100 C and with a SiO 2 /Si 3 N 4 on top measured: D I 1X8 Â 10 À9 cm 2 as 1100 C Y k S 7X1 Â 10 À7 cmas 1100 C Y C eq I 6X45 Â 10 16 cm À3 1100 C X According to Griffin et al [23] who tried to observe the effects that bulk traps have on the measured values of D I , our measurements should correspond to effective values. However, if this were the case, we should have observed different values for D I according to the kind of material, since CZ silicon would have more defects than FZ silicon wafers.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 The decay has been attributed to trap-limited indiffusion of self-interstitials into the Si crystal. 17,18 The nature of these traps is not known. Excess vacancies in MBEgrown layers and background C doping have been discussed as possible candidates for interstitial trapping.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%