2013
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201200869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model for Conformational Relaxation of Flexible Conjugated Polymers: Application to p‐Phenylenevinylene Trimers in Nonpolar Solvents

Abstract: Photoexcitation of flexible conjugated polymers is invariably followed by a fast conformational/torsional relaxation towards a configuration favouring coplanarity of the conjugated segments. In general, the experimental relaxation rate constant (k(CR)) depends on the solvent viscosity (η) and temperature (T), and is not proportional to T/η. A theory capable of explaining the observed dependence of k(CR) on T and η over a wide range of these variables is not available. This gap is filled here by presenting a st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The α values, being lower than 1, indicate that the microscopic frictional force that hinders the conformational relaxation of the compounds is less effective than that predicted by the Stokes‐Einstein model, that is, a force proportional to the macroscopic solvent viscosity. A similar situation ( α < 1) has been observed before with different systems, and it was related with the fact that the viscosity is a macroscopic parameter. The solvent viscosity used to describe solute‐solvent friction processes does not take into account, for example, specific solute‐solvent interactions or structural differences of the evolved molecules, which affect the hydrodynamic boundary condition (stick‐slip) of a microscopic description of these systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The α values, being lower than 1, indicate that the microscopic frictional force that hinders the conformational relaxation of the compounds is less effective than that predicted by the Stokes‐Einstein model, that is, a force proportional to the macroscopic solvent viscosity. A similar situation ( α < 1) has been observed before with different systems, and it was related with the fact that the viscosity is a macroscopic parameter. The solvent viscosity used to describe solute‐solvent friction processes does not take into account, for example, specific solute‐solvent interactions or structural differences of the evolved molecules, which affect the hydrodynamic boundary condition (stick‐slip) of a microscopic description of these systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As listed in Table , the pre-exponential factors are positive when the decays are collected in the onset of the emission band, although when the emission decays are collected at lower energies (on the tail of the emission band), a negative amplitude (rise-time), associated with the shortest decay time (and in the case of P3HT also for the intermediate decay), is present. As described elsewhere, for different types of families of organic conjugated polymers and oligomers, the presence of a fast component, which appears as a decay time in the high energy part of the emission spectra and as a rise-time for low energies, is in general assigned to fast relaxation processes (excitation energy migration or conformational relaxation) in the excited state. ,, For all the polymers, the pre-exponential factors associated with the slower decay time, τ 1 (see Table ), increases when going from the onset to the tail of the emission band and is assigned to the relaxed and more stable (lower energy) conformation of the polymers. An opposite behavior was found for the fastest decay component (and intermediary decay component in the P3HT case) where, respectively, a decrease and appearance of negative pre-exponential values were found when going to lower energies in the emission band.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…23 Nevertheless, for homoPT and coPT, the sterically bulky TPE pendant groups hinders fast torsional molecular movements of the polymer backbone, thus explaining the absence of conformational relaxation for the homoPT and coPT polythiophenes. 35 To further understand the nature of the different dominant decay mechanism observed for P3HT in comparison with homoPT and coPT, the time-resolved behavior of the regioregular poly(3-dodecylthiophene-2,5-diyl), P3DDT, in toluene solution as a function of temperature was investigated. Again, three decay components (with decay times of 30, 190, and 520 ps at 293 K) were found when collecting the decay profiles along the emission band of the polymer, (see Table S4; and for the P3DDT detailed study and discussion, see the Supporting Information).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations