2017
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model for multiblock columns subjected to base excitation

Abstract: Summary A new model is presented for multiblock columns subjected to earthquakes, which contains an impact and an opening model. Both in the impact and in the opening model, all the possible opening configurations are investigated because it was found that in many practical cases, unexpected patterns may occur. The model is purely mechanical: assuming rigid blocks and classical (inelastic) impact. The effect of energy dissipation during impact was investigated. Using our model in accordance with the literature… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To solve the above problem for a multi‐block structure, several approaches are possible, as it was discussed in the study of Ther and Kollár: Analytical solutions due to the complex geometry are feasible only for the four‐hinge, SDOF mechanisms Available FE codes (eg, ANSYS and OpenSees) might be able to calculate the motion of blocks including the deformability of the elements; however, no proper “impact” and “opening” routines are available, hence, these codes must be combined with “opening” and “impact” models.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To solve the above problem for a multi‐block structure, several approaches are possible, as it was discussed in the study of Ther and Kollár: Analytical solutions due to the complex geometry are feasible only for the four‐hinge, SDOF mechanisms Available FE codes (eg, ANSYS and OpenSees) might be able to calculate the motion of blocks including the deformability of the elements; however, no proper “impact” and “opening” routines are available, hence, these codes must be combined with “opening” and “impact” models.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available FE codes (eg, ANSYS and OpenSees) might be able to calculate the motion of blocks including the deformability of the elements; however, no proper “impact” and “opening” routines are available, hence, these codes must be combined with “opening” and “impact” models. We formerly connected OpenSees with the MatLab “opening” and “impact” routines introduced in the study of Ther and Kollár; however, numerical difficulties have been arised because of the high frequency axial vibration of the elements (same numerical difficulties are also mentioned by Vassiliou et al). In theory, the DEM is capable of analyzing the investigated problem, and it is a possible good choice. However, it requires the setting of certain parameters (eg, joint stiffness and damping properties, see the study of DeJong) in such a way that the numerical analyses are close to the experimental results and, furthermore, the number of unknowns is high for a problem, which can be described only by the rotations of the blocks in 2D.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations