2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9196992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Learning for Control of a Paralyzed Human Arm with Functional Electrical Stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We test the performance of our controller in tracking different trajectories in these tasks. We compare the performance of our controller to that of a PID controller, a conventional method for controlling FES [26], [29]. In single muscle control scenario of vertical motion, the simulation results show that both controllers can track desired trajectories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We test the performance of our controller in tracking different trajectories in these tasks. We compare the performance of our controller to that of a PID controller, a conventional method for controlling FES [26], [29]. In single muscle control scenario of vertical motion, the simulation results show that both controllers can track desired trajectories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout an episode, the fatigue level changes as a function of applied stimulation intensity and the fatigue rate. As a comparison baseline, we also implement a PID controller on all our tasks, due to it being the conventional method used in many FES control applications such as cycling [24], [25] and arm motion [26]. In tasks requiring control of multiple muscles, such as cycling, PID control is used together with a pre-defined active muscle pattern that determines to which muscles the stimulation is applied.…”
Section: Controller Setup and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed a trajectory optimization routine which accounts for the muscle capabilities of the individual and the dynamics of the arm to find feasible trajectories to a target arm configuration. We compared the performance of controlling the arm along these optimized planned trajectories compared to naive direct-totarget paths using three control structures that are commonly used in FES-driven reaching: a feedback controller [9,14], a feedforward-feedback controller [19], and a model predictive control (MPC) controller [20]. An illustration of our control framework is seen in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Direct-to-target trajectories: Direct-to-target trajectories were defined as a similar approach to the straight-line trajectories followed in previous research [9,14]. We defined a fifthorder polynomial for each joint which began at the starting arm configuration with zero velocity and ended at the target configuration with zero-velocity producing smooth, minimumjerk trajectories similar to natural human reaching [31].…”
Section: Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation