2013
DOI: 10.1177/1077546313479993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model predictive control algorithms for active vibration control: a study on timing, performance and implementation properties

Abstract: The dynamic properties of vibration control systems pose unique requirements and challenges on the implementation of model predictive control (MPC) algorithms with stability and feasibility guarantees. This article presents a comprehensive experimental comparison of computation timing and damping performance for various MPC methods; analyzing their offline and online properties in active vibration control and their impact on practical implementability. Optimal and sub-optimal MPC algorithms providing guarantee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the theoretical approach behind Mobayen, 2014;Cortes et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2016). Such methods aim to provide on-line optimization and feedback correction according to the feedback prediction control models Takacs et al, 2014;Mobayen, 2015). These can solve the problem of parameters uncertainty in the analysis of the high-dimensional complex model, and hence enhance the robustness and anti-interference of the system to random disturbances (Mobayen, 2016;Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the theoretical approach behind Mobayen, 2014;Cortes et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2016). Such methods aim to provide on-line optimization and feedback correction according to the feedback prediction control models Takacs et al, 2014;Mobayen, 2015). These can solve the problem of parameters uncertainty in the analysis of the high-dimensional complex model, and hence enhance the robustness and anti-interference of the system to random disturbances (Mobayen, 2016;Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MPC problem (3) was formulated with control horizon of N = 50 steps which practically amounts to the prediction over 1 second. The choice for this horizon is motivated by the stability guarantees assumed in the problem formulation and allows the expected range of positions and velocities to be covered by the controller's domain of attraction, see [25]. In addition, state and input penalties were chosen as Q = I and R = 1, respectively, P N set to the solution of DARE and C ∞ designed as the maximal control invariant set-rendering the controller response such that it attenuates the beam tip vibration efficiently and yet does not behave like an overly aggressive 'bang-bang'-like controller.…”
Section: A Active Beam Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table I illustrates both of these critical aspects. By implementing the proposed algorithms, cheap entrylevel MCU like the F100x can compute the same optimal constrained MPC moves with guaranteed stability and even long horizons that would otherwise need powerful hardware [25]. Conversely, high-end microcontrollers like the F407x can execute the benchmark vibration control problem in the microsecond range, suggesting that even faster applications or better mathematical models are within the realm of possibilities.…”
Section: B Cross-platform Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This feature motivates tackling the AVC using MPC. [28][29][30] Despite the limiting requirement for fast sampling which is known as the main drawback of MPC in AVC applications, it is shown in this paper that the proposed method is fast enough to overcome this problem even in high frequencies of disturbance signal. Finally, the application of MPC in nonlinear systems is mostly neglected in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%