The 27th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2015 CCDC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ccdc.2015.7162518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model predictive control for path following of stratospheric airship with magnitude and rate constrains of rudder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classified by the applied control techniques, we can roughly see two categories when treating the uncertainty (such as external disturbance): the robust control where we design controller to suppress the unknown uncertainty, and the estimation-based controller where we design a dynamical system to estimate the unknown uncertainty, and compensate it by using the closed-loop controller. For the first category, we can cite the Lyapunov theory based controllers [2,3,4,5,6], the Line of Sight guidance laws for path following [7,8], gain scheduling controllers [9,10], sliding mode controls [11,12], model predictive controls [13,14], etc. For the second type, it is also named as active disturbance rejection control in the literature, which has been applied in [15] to control the horizontal trajectory of an airship.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classified by the applied control techniques, we can roughly see two categories when treating the uncertainty (such as external disturbance): the robust control where we design controller to suppress the unknown uncertainty, and the estimation-based controller where we design a dynamical system to estimate the unknown uncertainty, and compensate it by using the closed-loop controller. For the first category, we can cite the Lyapunov theory based controllers [2,3,4,5,6], the Line of Sight guidance laws for path following [7,8], gain scheduling controllers [9,10], sliding mode controls [11,12], model predictive controls [13,14], etc. For the second type, it is also named as active disturbance rejection control in the literature, which has been applied in [15] to control the horizontal trajectory of an airship.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GBPF principle based station-keeping can be described as [24]:Given a parameterized path ς p = (x p ( ), x p ( )) T in path parallel frame(PPF) to be followed, the position will finally converge to the ς p by designing a desired ψ c , where > 0 is the path parameter, and ψ c is the attitude angle. The path parallel frame(PPF) are defined in Fig.…”
Section: A Gbpf Control For Station-keepingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there are a few strategies which address transition between different flight phases, such as: by switching between controllers specifically designed for each flight phase ; assuming that the airship dynamic model is well known and designing a coupled controller [Moutinho et al, 2016]; or performing an optimization in control inputs also using the dynamical model [Zhu et al, 2015]. Here we design a single decoupled longitudinal controller for all flight phases.…”
Section: Longitudinal Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%