2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1801.09739
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model selection in sparse high-dimensional vine copula models with application to portfolio risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows capturing tail dependence across the marginals themselves. We control the fitting performance and the number of parameters included in this second layer using information criteria such as AIC, BIC or sparse modified BIC for vines (mBICV) (Nagler, Bumann and Czado, 2018).…”
Section: Appendix A: Baseline Bivariate Copulas or Pair-copulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This allows capturing tail dependence across the marginals themselves. We control the fitting performance and the number of parameters included in this second layer using information criteria such as AIC, BIC or sparse modified BIC for vines (mBICV) (Nagler, Bumann and Czado, 2018).…”
Section: Appendix A: Baseline Bivariate Copulas or Pair-copulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling extremal behaviour accurately requires flexible dependence structures as formalised by the asymptotic dependence (Wadsworth et al, 2017;Huser and Wadsworth, 2019), regularly varying distributions (Mikosch, 2006;Weng and Zhang, 2012) or sparse structures for high-dimensions (Engelke and Ivanovs, 2021;Engelke and Hitz, 2020). Although the EEP framework remains model-agnostic in its current formulation, vine copulas (Bedford and Cooke, 2002)-a family of hierarchical pairwise graphical copulas-are a balance between adjustable extremal properties (Joe, Li and Nikoloulopoulos, 2010), the ability to capture non-linear relationships (Gräler, 2014;Erhardt, Czado and Schepsmeier, 2015) and scalability capabilities (Nagler, Bumann and Czado, 2018;Nagler, Krüger and Min, 2020). It also offers a conditional sampling mechanism (Bevacqua et al, 2017, App.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%