2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model sensitivity analysis of Monte-Carlo based SEM simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Ganachaud et al [ 99 ] have pointed it out that whether or not taking the acoustic-phonon scattering into account would not cause an obvious variation in the secondary electron yield in their Monte Carlo simulations, but incorporating it into the simulation would result in a narrower secondary electron peak. On the other hand, it was shown that the omit of acoustic-phonon scattering results in a significant overestimation of secondary electron yield only for primary energies below 200 eV in a model sensitivity analysis of Monte Carlo simulation of SEM image contrast [ 108 ].
Figure 5.
…”
Section: Electron Transport Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Ganachaud et al [ 99 ] have pointed it out that whether or not taking the acoustic-phonon scattering into account would not cause an obvious variation in the secondary electron yield in their Monte Carlo simulations, but incorporating it into the simulation would result in a narrower secondary electron peak. On the other hand, it was shown that the omit of acoustic-phonon scattering results in a significant overestimation of secondary electron yield only for primary energies below 200 eV in a model sensitivity analysis of Monte Carlo simulation of SEM image contrast [ 108 ].
Figure 5.
…”
Section: Electron Transport Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is suggested that several metaheuristic approaches may be considered for better assessment of sensitivity [ 87 ] or Monte-Carlo simulations [ [8][8]] , [8][9]] ]. Following the study of Naik and Kirvan [ 90 ], this could provide better output, even for applications of feature selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the charge is moved parallel to its velocity vector over a random distance that is consistent with λ, and the scattering process is executed. 18,19 When considering the first Monte Carlo step after the generation of the particle, its quantum-mechanical state is a spherical wave and an isotropic distribution of velocity directions is assumed from which a random direction is selected.…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%