2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17353-5_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling 1D Distributed-Memory Dense Kernels for an Asynchronous Multifrontal Sparse Solver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amestoy, L’Excellent and Sid-Lakhdar (2014 a ) further notice that, although greatly improving the communication performance, this broadcast scheme breaks the fundamental properties on which they were relying to ensure deadlock-free factorizations. They then propose adaptations of deadlock prevention and avoidance algorithms to the context of asynchronous distributed-memory environments.…”
Section: Multifrontal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Amestoy, L’Excellent and Sid-Lakhdar (2014 a ) further notice that, although greatly improving the communication performance, this broadcast scheme breaks the fundamental properties on which they were relying to ensure deadlock-free factorizations. They then propose adaptations of deadlock prevention and avoidance algorithms to the context of asynchronous distributed-memory environments.…”
Section: Multifrontal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amestoy, L’Excellent, Rouet and Sid-Lakhdar (2014 b ) propose improvements to the one-dimensional asynchronous distributed-memory dense kernels algorithms to improve the scalability of their multifrontal solver. They notice that, in a left-looking approach, the master process produces factorized panels faster at the beginning than at the end of its factorization, thus resulting in improved scheduling between master and slaves.…”
Section: Multifrontal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 8(a), more rows must then be associated to the processors that appear first in the front. Note that we also want to adjust relative size of q and r to balance the workload between the master and each worker by splitting nodes of the separator tree (Amestoy et al, 2001(Amestoy et al, , 2014.…”
Section: Differences Between the Factorization And The Solve Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%