2018
DOI: 10.1002/qua.25719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling absorption spectra of molecules in solution

Abstract: The presence of solvent tunes many properties of a molecule, such as its ground and excited state geometry, dipole moment, excitation energy, and absorption spectrum. Because the energy of the system will vary depending on the solvent configuration, explicit solute-solvent interactions are key to understanding solution-phase reactivity and spectroscopy, simulating accurate inhomogeneous broadening, and predicting absorption spectra. In this tutorial review, we give an overview of factors to consider when model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
106
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
(266 reference statements)
3
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electron density difference between the ground and first excited states is shown as blue (red) 0.001 iso-surface representing electron density gain (loss)5 Application to Absorption SpectrumTo demonstrate the capability of SchNet, we compute the UV-Vis absorption spectra for OTs in dichloromethane, possibly the most commonly measured electronic property of OSCs. Despite recent progress,[92][93][94][95][96] accurate atomistic modeling of solution-phase absorption spectra remains challenging, and one of the challenges is the large number of configurations responsible for spectral inhomogeneity, whose excited-state properties need to be computed via quantum chemistry methods. The relatively high computational cost of excited-state calculations calls for more efficient methods, such as many semi-empirical methods,97 and here we Histogram of electron-hole separation for 6T molecular configurations with errors in SchNet predicted |Âľ 1 | 2 greater than 2.0D 2 , using a cutoff radius of 25Å.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron density difference between the ground and first excited states is shown as blue (red) 0.001 iso-surface representing electron density gain (loss)5 Application to Absorption SpectrumTo demonstrate the capability of SchNet, we compute the UV-Vis absorption spectra for OTs in dichloromethane, possibly the most commonly measured electronic property of OSCs. Despite recent progress,[92][93][94][95][96] accurate atomistic modeling of solution-phase absorption spectra remains challenging, and one of the challenges is the large number of configurations responsible for spectral inhomogeneity, whose excited-state properties need to be computed via quantum chemistry methods. The relatively high computational cost of excited-state calculations calls for more efficient methods, such as many semi-empirical methods,97 and here we Histogram of electron-hole separation for 6T molecular configurations with errors in SchNet predicted |Âľ 1 | 2 greater than 2.0D 2 , using a cutoff radius of 25Å.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we compare our results to the experimental absorption spectrum of the GFP chromophore in aqueous solution. The ensemble method 30,35,38,[46][47][48]68 we have used thus far captures the effects of explicit chomophore-environment interactions.…”
Section: Simulated Solution Phase Spectra and Comparison With Expmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Here we will apply a new method developed by two of the authors that combines the ensemble method with a zerotemperature Franck-Condon shape function. 44,45,68 This E-ZTFC approach treats all temperature effects classically through the MD ensemble sampling and all vibronic transitions of the chromophore at zero temperature (vibronic transitions originate only from the ground state vibrational levels). Although the E-ZTFC method possesses some double counting of the nuclear degrees of freedom of the chromophore 44 , the agreement with experimental spectra is good for the systems studied thus far and the method is a promising approach for capturing both vibronic effects and specific solute-environment effects.…”
Section: Simulated Solution Phase Spectra and Comparison With Expmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For larger ones, like flexible molecules in condensed phase, a number of approximated protocols to mix classical MD sampling and vibronic computations have been proposed. 7,37,48,[58][59][60][61][62] In the simplest approaches, the vibronic spectrum of the solute has been considered independent of the specific MD snapshot. [58][59][60][61] A way to go beyond this approximation, explicitly accounting for the coupling of intra-molecular and inter-molecular vibrations, is to use in vibronic calculations spectral densities extracted from classical MD trajectories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%