Modeling and Evaluation of the Systematic Errors for the Polarization-Sensitive Imaging Lidar Technique

Abstract

Polarization lidar plays a significant role in characterizing the properties of cirrus clouds, classifying aerosol types, retrieving aerosol microphysical properties, etc. However, the retrieval reliability and accuracy of the linear volume depolarization ratio (LVDR) of atmospheric particles rely on many system factors, requiring intensive attention and massive efforts on system calibrations and error evaluations, etc. In this work, a theoretical model based on the Stokes–Mueller formalism has been established for the newly developed polarization-sensitive imaging lidar (PSI-Lidar) technique. The systematic errors introduced by the degree of linear polarization (DoLP) of the emitted laser beam, the offset angle, and the quantum efficiencies (QEs) and polarization extinction ratios (PERs) of the polarization-sensitive image sensor, were evaluated in detail for the PSI-Lidar at 450, 520, and 808 nm. Although the DoLP of typical multimode laser diodes is not very high, the influence of non-ideal polarized laser beam on the LVDR can be reduced to less than 1% by employing a high-PER linear polarizer to improve the DoLP of the transmitted laser beam. Laboratory measurements have revealed that the relative QEs of the image sensor with four polarized directions are independent of the total illumination intensity and indicate a good consistency with the factory relative QEs (less than 2% deviation). Meanwhile, the influence of the relative QEs on the LVDR can be well-calibrated from either experimental or factory relative QEs. Owing to the non-ideal PER of the polarization-sensitive image sensor, e.g., ≈74 at 808 nm, ≈470 at 450 nm, the crosstalk between received signals with different polarization states can significantly deteriorate the measurement accuracy for small LVDRs. A relative error of the LVDR less than 4% can be achieved at 450 and 520 nm with the LVDR varying from 0.004 to 0.3 for a PER uncertainty of ± 5%, by taking the polarization crosstalk effect into account. However, in order to achieve a relative error of less than 10% for a small atmospheric LVDR of 0.004 at 808 nm, the uncertainty of the PER should be less than ± 2.5%. The offset angle can be calculated based on the four polarized lidar signals and the PER values at the four polarization angles. It was found out that the retrieval error of the offset angle is less than 0.15° even with a large PER uncertainty (±20%), giving a negligible systematic error on the LVDR (less than 1%).

A review on the methane emission detection during offshore natural gas hydrate production

“…This method is very useful for solving the backscattering problem caused by suspended particles in seawater. 3) Polarization imaging technique, is to improve the resolution of imaging by using the polarization characteristics of reflected light and backscattered light of objects (Boer et al, 1998;Kong et al, 2020). This technique could improve the specific illumination and resolution by adjusting the ratio of reflected and scattered light energy.…”

Modified Model of Polarized Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function Used for Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)

“…By changing the applied voltage of the electro-optic modulation crystal, the polarization state of the reflected laser is modulated, so as to realize the correlation between the distance information and the gray information in the image of the array detector in the system, thus realizing three-dimensional imaging [1][2][3][4][5]. LiDAR based on polarization modulation has the advantages of a short exposure time and flash imaging, which is suitable for target detection [6][7][8]. In the actual application of LiDAR based on polarization modulation, the polarization characteristics of the scattering light are different due to the different surface materials of the target, and the detection effect of the target using LiDAR based on polarization is also different.…”

Universal Synthesizer of Mueller Matrices Based on the Symmetry Properties of the Enpolarizing Ellipsoid

“…Measured Mueller matrices provide information on the nature, structure, morphology and other properties of a huge variety of material samples [1], including scattering by particles, aerosols and hydrosols [2][3][4][5][6][7] where the symmetries play a key role [8][9][10][11]. A way to understand the physical information provided by M is to design a general algebraic or geometric synthesizer of Mueller matrices, where the way in which the overall polarimetric properties are generated arises in a natural manner.…”