2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00202-017-0632-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and implementation of a new ZCS interleaved bidirectional buck–boost DC–DC converter for energy storage systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this converter requires a high inductors value to operate in continuous conduction mode (CCM), which increases its volume and cost. To obtain low current ripple, low current stress, and low voltage stress in the switches, the converters in earlier studies 22,23 are developed aiming the energy storage system interface working with zero current switching (ZCS) and hence avoiding the most part of switching losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this converter requires a high inductors value to operate in continuous conduction mode (CCM), which increases its volume and cost. To obtain low current ripple, low current stress, and low voltage stress in the switches, the converters in earlier studies 22,23 are developed aiming the energy storage system interface working with zero current switching (ZCS) and hence avoiding the most part of switching losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many structures have ZVS or ZCS at either turn‐on or turn‐off. For example, in [12], a structure of ZCS DC‐DC converter is proposed, but the soft switching is provided only at turn‐on. In [13], an improved ZVS–PWM, active clamp/reset forward converter, with turn‐on zero voltage switching is presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%