2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and parameter importance investigation for simulating in-plane and out-of-plane behaviors of un-reinforced masonry walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the stress return mapping procedure of multi-surface plasticity models is more challenging than that of single surface plasticity model because the difference of region (B 1 , C 1 , and A) cannot be distinguished by checking the yield conditions F i > 0 only, that is, Equation (17). Simo and Hughes 37 recommended a generic solution that needs checking of yield conditions F i > 0 as well as plastic multipliers (d𝜆 i > 0), which provides a more precise set of active surfaces that can be represented as:…”
Section: Determination Of the Correct Active Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the stress return mapping procedure of multi-surface plasticity models is more challenging than that of single surface plasticity model because the difference of region (B 1 , C 1 , and A) cannot be distinguished by checking the yield conditions F i > 0 only, that is, Equation (17). Simo and Hughes 37 recommended a generic solution that needs checking of yield conditions F i > 0 as well as plastic multipliers (d𝜆 i > 0), which provides a more precise set of active surfaces that can be represented as:…”
Section: Determination Of the Correct Active Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing literature shows that damage mechanics and plasticity theory are commonly used for interface models. The use of damage mechanics-based interface models become popular in simulating masonry structures, 16,17 and this is likely due to the availability of such interface models in commercially available finite element (FE) programs such as ABAQUS. 18 However, these interface models 18 do not have the option for frictional resistance which is always found in shear/mode II failure of masonry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The characterisation of the masonry's softening behaviour in tension is of importance for the assessment of existing masonry structures, as shown for example in [13][14][15][16]. However, direct tensile tests are challenging and often are not commonly available in laboratory [32].…”
Section: Influence Of the Specimen's Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its determination is required to describe the quasi-brittle response of masonry or predict masonry's cracking and failure process through nonlinear analysis. In this context, a small variation of the tensile bond fracture energy may lead to a variation in the estimation of, e.g., the out-ofplane force capacity [13,14] and the in-plane capacity in terms of ductility and base shear force [15] of masonry walls, and the crack width and damage level of masonry buildings [16]. However, this property is never tested in-situ when performing structural assessments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%