2021
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202112.0458.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Risk Analysis of Dam-Break Flooding in a Semi‐Arid Montane Watershed.

Abstract: The risk related to embankment dam breaches needs to be evaluated in order to prepare emergency action plans. The physical and hydrodynamic parameters of the flood wave generated from dam-failure event correspond to various breach parameters such as width, slope and formation time. This study aimed to simulate dam-breach failure scenario of Yabous dam (NE Algeria) and analyze its influence on areas (urban and natural environments) downstream the dam. The simulation was completed using the sensitivity analysis … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed process offers possibilities for the application of Iber in other types of analyses in which cases need to be systematically executed, such as probabilistic studies or sensitivity analyses [58][59][60][61]. Similar processes are already in application to generate training sets for ML surrogate models in hydrological studies [62][63][64], as well as to analyse the effect of breach properties on the floodplain [65,66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed process offers possibilities for the application of Iber in other types of analyses in which cases need to be systematically executed, such as probabilistic studies or sensitivity analyses [58][59][60][61]. Similar processes are already in application to generate training sets for ML surrogate models in hydrological studies [62][63][64], as well as to analyse the effect of breach properties on the floodplain [65,66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%