2020
DOI: 10.3233/ao-200236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling artificial agents’ actions in context – a deontic cognitive event ontology

Abstract: Although there have been efforts to integrate Semantic Web technologies and artificial agents related AI research approaches, they remain relatively isolated from each other. Herein, we introduce a new ontology framework designed to support the knowledge representation of artificial agents’ actions within the context of the actions of other autonomous agents and inspired by standard cognitive architectures. The framework consists of four parts: 1) an event ontology for information pertaining to actions and eve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AWARE ontology [37] describes observations and decisions of a mobile robot, but as well fails to explain how they relate. The Deontic Cognitive Event Ontology (DCEO) models the mental states of agents for interaction, e.g., perception, beliefs, desires and intentions [38]. DCEO does not support our use case, however, as it associates those mental states with the owner in a highly abstract way, neglecting all internal control systems, which makes it impossible to trace the information flow.…”
Section: Ontological Models Of Ca Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AWARE ontology [37] describes observations and decisions of a mobile robot, but as well fails to explain how they relate. The Deontic Cognitive Event Ontology (DCEO) models the mental states of agents for interaction, e.g., perception, beliefs, desires and intentions [38]. DCEO does not support our use case, however, as it associates those mental states with the owner in a highly abstract way, neglecting all internal control systems, which makes it impossible to trace the information flow.…”
Section: Ontological Models Of Ca Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ship activity events can modeled using general event models. In current academic research, concept-based event models [24][25][26][27], logic-based hierarchical event models [28][29][30][31], and sextuplet-based event models [32][33][34][35] are used. The modeling of ship activities in this study belongs to the category of domainspecific ontology modeling, where concept-based event models such as ABC ontology [24] model, SEM [25], EO [26] model, and CIDOC-CRM [27] model are primarily used.…”
Section: Design Of Ontology Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the BDI entities (inter alia desire and intention) would tend to be loosely characterized, especially so that their parent types are identified, but sometimes with no further detailed examination. Examples include belief as a "mental disposition" in the MF, the BDI entities as "mental moments" in UFO-C [9] (which is a module for social and intentional entities in the upper ontology the Unified Foundational Ontology), and the BDI entities as "mental states" in a Deontic Cognitive Event Ontology [10] (which provides an OWL support of representation and reasoning on complex cognitive information).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%