2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6cp04347j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling blue to UV upconversion in β-NaYF4:Tm3+

Abstract: Samples of 0.01% and 0.3% Tm-doped β-NaYF show upconverted UV luminescence at 27 660 cm (361 nm) after blue excitation at 21 140 cm (473 nm). Contradictory upconversion mechanisms in the literature are reviewed and two of them are investigated in detail. Their agreement with emission and two-color excitation experiments is examined and compared. Decay curves are analyzed using the Inokuti-Hirayama model, an average rate equation model, and a microscopic rate equation model that includes the correct extent of e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to a critical Förster radius of 9.2 Å for Er 3+ –Er 3+ cross-relaxation, a typical value for Förster transfer to a lanthanide acceptor. 42,51 For Er 3+ –Yb 3+ cross-relaxation we obtain 3.5 Å, somewhat shorter because of the energy mismatch for this pathway (Figure 3c). Alternatively, we can calculate a rate of 308 ms –1 for cross-relaxation from the green-emitting levels ( 2 H 11/2 and 4 S 3/2 ) to a nearest-neighbor Er 3+ ion or 1.0 ms –1 to a nearest-neighbor Yb 3+ ion, compared to a radiative decay rate of 1.6 ms –1 for NCs in toluene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This corresponds to a critical Förster radius of 9.2 Å for Er 3+ –Er 3+ cross-relaxation, a typical value for Förster transfer to a lanthanide acceptor. 42,51 For Er 3+ –Yb 3+ cross-relaxation we obtain 3.5 Å, somewhat shorter because of the energy mismatch for this pathway (Figure 3c). Alternatively, we can calculate a rate of 308 ms –1 for cross-relaxation from the green-emitting levels ( 2 H 11/2 and 4 S 3/2 ) to a nearest-neighbor Er 3+ ion or 1.0 ms –1 to a nearest-neighbor Yb 3+ ion, compared to a radiative decay rate of 1.6 ms –1 for NCs in toluene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…49 This and other variations of and correlations between the rates of various UC steps can only be taken into account fully with a microscopic theoretical model that considers individual luminescent centers ( e . g ., Er 3+ and Yb 3+ ) explicitly, 51 as an alternative to the more common mean-field models. 35,52 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core of all the nanoparticles under investigation contains an equivalent concentration of the sensitizer and activator ions and only the concentration of the Tb 3+ ions in the shell varies, to avoid the introduction of ulterior differences between the samples. The UCL mechanism of Yb 3+ , Tm 3+ co‐doped materials continues to be under investigation, as the population of the high‐energy states is disputed . Co‐doped materials with Tm 3+ and Yb 3+ undergo upconversion luminescence mainly through ETU.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some differences in the relative intensities of the Tm 3+ emission bands are observed for samples deposited on silicon and quartz substrates, in particular for the 1 D 2 → 3 F 4 and 1 G 4 → 3 H 6 emission transitions. Presently, this behavior cannot be easily rationalized, and it could be tentatively attributed to an effect of cross‐relaxation processes among the Tm 3+ ions, due to possible clustering of the lanthanide ions . Additional experiments using samples at different Tm 3+ concentration would be necessary in order to shed light on this issue.…”
Section: Values Of the A‐axis Parameters Of The Caf2:yb3+ Er3+ Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%