1996
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<2952:mccpit>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Cirrus Clouds. Part I: Treatment of Bimodal Size Spectra and Case Study Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
66
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their estimates for E agg tend to be around 0.3, but values of 0.1 also gave reasonable agreement with the observations; important to note was that there was no strong dependence of the aggregation efficiency on temperature. Mitchell et al (1996) found from a case study in cirrus clouds that the cloud-averaged E agg was ∼ 0.5. More recently, Mitchell et al (2006) applied a new snow growth model to calculate that in a case dominated by dendrites at cloud top E agg ∼ = 0.55 whereas in other cases E agg ∼ = 0.07.…”
Section: P J Connolly Et Al: Aggregation Of Ice Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their estimates for E agg tend to be around 0.3, but values of 0.1 also gave reasonable agreement with the observations; important to note was that there was no strong dependence of the aggregation efficiency on temperature. Mitchell et al (1996) found from a case study in cirrus clouds that the cloud-averaged E agg was ∼ 0.5. More recently, Mitchell et al (2006) applied a new snow growth model to calculate that in a case dominated by dendrites at cloud top E agg ∼ = 0.55 whereas in other cases E agg ∼ = 0.07.…”
Section: P J Connolly Et Al: Aggregation Of Ice Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bimodal ice crystal size distribution, as observed by, e.g., McFarquhar and Heymsfield [1996] and Mitchell et al [1996b], is assumed with an exponential behavior for small crystals and a À-distribution for larger ice crystals. The size distribution used is the same as given by Stubenrauch et al [1999c], with the difference that the mean maximum dimension from the contribution of small particles is now fixed to 20 mm instead of 40 mm.…”
Section: Randomly Oriented Planar Polycrystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggregation is a process where ice particles collide with each other and combine to form larger "aggregates" comprised of individual ice crystals. It has been demonstrated that aggregation is an important growth process for ice particles in cirrus clouds (Mitchell et al 1996). Aggregation will act on all PSD, depleting the concentrations of small ice crystals to form larger ones and possibly producing a secondary maximum in concentration ~ 200 µm particle size when ice crystals are produced only through heterogeneous processes.…”
Section: Tropical Cirrus Clouds: Tc4 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSD associated with in situ cirrus do not show a transition from bimodal to mono-modal size-spectra near -40°C, which appears consistent with their lower updrafts. The mono-modal PSD at the coldest level for in situ cirrus may reflect a reduced impact from aggregation near cloud top (aggregation influences on PSDs increase with distance from cloud top (Mitchell 1988, Mitchell et al 1996). The above information can be presented in terms of the bulk properties of the PSD; total number concentration N and mean ice particle size (maximum dimension),D.…”
Section: Tropical Cirrus Clouds: Tc4 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%