2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-015-1527-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling climate-driven changes in U.S. buildings energy demand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this analysis, it is assumed that all space cooling services in the model are used to mitigate heat stress and so the total cooling demand is the sum of the cooling required to mitigate each heat stress level. As described by Brown et al (2016), the relationship between temperature and cooling demand may be represented by different functions depending on factors including building properties, diffusion of cooling technologies and cultural preferences. Following the method of Labriet et al (2015), this study assumes that the usage of cooling appliances changes but the diffusion of appliances does not change as a response to climate change.…”
Section: Energy Demand For High Stress Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this analysis, it is assumed that all space cooling services in the model are used to mitigate heat stress and so the total cooling demand is the sum of the cooling required to mitigate each heat stress level. As described by Brown et al (2016), the relationship between temperature and cooling demand may be represented by different functions depending on factors including building properties, diffusion of cooling technologies and cultural preferences. Following the method of Labriet et al (2015), this study assumes that the usage of cooling appliances changes but the diffusion of appliances does not change as a response to climate change.…”
Section: Energy Demand For High Stress Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge that in building literature there are studies that use a piecewise linear function to identify cooling and heating turn on points (often referred to as balance points) 45 , 46 , 65 – 67 . We use the quadratic function over the piecewise linear function due to higher R 2 values, which is consistent with other studies 68 (see Supplementary Information Note 12 for more discussion).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different de‐trending approaches proposed in the literature (Bessec & Fouquau, 2008). The method used in this study (Sailor & Muñoz, 1997) is one the most widely used approaches in the climate‐energy research literature and its effectiveness has been extensively documented (Alipour et al., 2019; Brown et al., 2016; Khoshbakht et al., 2018; Mukherjee & Nateghi, 2017a; Parkinson & Djilali, 2015; Santágata et al., 2017). The de‐trending process involves the following steps: E(y)=y=1nyearsm=112E(m,y)nyears $E(y)=\frac{{\sum }_{y=1}^{{n}_{years}}{\sum }_{m=1}^{12}E(m,y)}{{n}_{years}}$ Where the total years, n years , range from 1990–2016; m denotes the month and y denotes the year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%