2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/bigdata.2015.7364008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling community detection using slow mixing random walks

Abstract: The task of community detection in a graph formalizes the intuitive task of grouping together subsets of vertices such that vertices within clusters are connected tighter than those in disparate clusters. This paper approaches community detection in graphs by constructing Markov random walks on the graphs. The mixing properties of the random walk are then used to identify communities. We use coupling from the past as an algorithmic primitive to translate the mixing properties of the walk into revealing the com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These metrics can be, for example, modularity, and we can optimize them through a global optimization approach [32,33]. Local methods of community detection consider local information of the network and thus approaches using random walk processes, cliques, influential nodes or leaders work as local methods [34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Furthermore, considering other sources of information may provide more realistic data to identify communities.…”
Section: Community Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These metrics can be, for example, modularity, and we can optimize them through a global optimization approach [32,33]. Local methods of community detection consider local information of the network and thus approaches using random walk processes, cliques, influential nodes or leaders work as local methods [34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Furthermore, considering other sources of information may provide more realistic data to identify communities.…”
Section: Community Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%