2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45866-2_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Context Information in Pervasive Computing Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
292
0
20

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 469 publications
(313 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
292
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed by Henricksen et al (2002), context information is: incorrect if it does not reflect the true state of the world that it is modelling; inconsistent, for example, if it contains contradictory information; incomplete if certain aspects of the context are unknown. Here is one example of a problem: a situation in which the user is using the application in a certain place and moves to another floor or building; if there is no treatment of quality, the context of location and/or profile that displays their preferences for nearby places to visit will quickly become out of date and may impair its interaction with the application.…”
Section: Quality Of Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed by Henricksen et al (2002), context information is: incorrect if it does not reflect the true state of the world that it is modelling; inconsistent, for example, if it contains contradictory information; incomplete if certain aspects of the context are unknown. Here is one example of a problem: a situation in which the user is using the application in a certain place and moves to another floor or building; if there is no treatment of quality, the context of location and/or profile that displays their preferences for nearby places to visit will quickly become out of date and may impair its interaction with the application.…”
Section: Quality Of Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we do not have a strong contribution here, we could not write about these requirements without mentioning the QoI aspect. The idea of the classifying associations by Henricksen et al [9] appears to be an important key towards QoI-based semantic reasoning and although they did not explicitly refer to the semantic web paradigm, the model proposed was obviously close to it and its semantic implementation would be straight forward. We also believe that the uncertainty aspect will not be tackled by the engine itself, rather that it is the way the engine is used and wrapped that can ever address this aspect.…”
Section: An Opening On Uncertainty and Quality Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue has a significant impact when dealing with distributed applications, where the decision making structure and the application are not hosted on the same machine. In order to realize an effective stabilization, stabilization mechanisms should take into account the following characteristics of contextual information mentioned in [11]: (i) Inaccuracy-This property expresses the fact that contextual information give the measure of observed phenomena with some errors. (ii) Incoherence-This property denotes that informations collected from different sensors can be contradictory.…”
Section: Flexible Context-aware Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%