2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Deflagration in Energetic Materials using the Uintah Computational Framework

Abstract: Predictive computer simulations of highly resolved large-scale 3D deflagrations and detonations are dependent on a robust reaction model embedded in a computational framework capable of running on massively parallel computer architectures. We have been developing such a model in the Uintah Computational Framework, which has exhibited good strong and weak scaling characteristics up to 512K cores [16]. Our focus is on predicting a Deflagration to Detonation Transition (DDT) when a large number of energetic devic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…gaseousp roducts at multiple initial temperatures andp ressures [17,18,19,20].T he DDT modelu tilizes am odified Ward, Son, and Brewster (WSB) burn model [18,20,21] to evaluate the mass conversion rate, the ViscoSCRAM constitutive model [22] to model the damage in the solid, and the JWL ++ simple reactive flow model [23] to describe detonation.T he commonly used JWL equation of state [ 23,24] was used for the solid explosivea nd the product gases. Detonation occurs in Uintah's DDT model whent he localized pressure is greater than the pressure threshold, 5.3 GPa [17,18].F urther details on the model can be found in references [ 17,18,19,20,25].T he Uintah framework has al ong history of high performance computing and has shown goods trong and weak scaling characteristics up to 512 Kc ores on DOE's Mira [26,27,28].U intah's strong scalability enabled us to run large 2D and full 3D simulations at high grid resolutions (2 mm). The reactionm odel has been validated at many resolutions including 2mm [ 19,29].…”
Section: C Omputational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gaseousp roducts at multiple initial temperatures andp ressures [17,18,19,20].T he DDT modelu tilizes am odified Ward, Son, and Brewster (WSB) burn model [18,20,21] to evaluate the mass conversion rate, the ViscoSCRAM constitutive model [22] to model the damage in the solid, and the JWL ++ simple reactive flow model [23] to describe detonation.T he commonly used JWL equation of state [ 23,24] was used for the solid explosivea nd the product gases. Detonation occurs in Uintah's DDT model whent he localized pressure is greater than the pressure threshold, 5.3 GPa [17,18].F urther details on the model can be found in references [ 17,18,19,20,25].T he Uintah framework has al ong history of high performance computing and has shown goods trong and weak scaling characteristics up to 512 Kc ores on DOE's Mira [26,27,28].U intah's strong scalability enabled us to run large 2D and full 3D simulations at high grid resolutions (2 mm). The reactionm odel has been validated at many resolutions including 2mm [ 19,29].…”
Section: C Omputational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ignition temperature was obtained based on the temperature history curve measured by the thermocouple sensor in experiments. The threshold pressure means that for a cell to be ignited after conduction combustion has been started, the product gas pressure in a surrounding cell must be above this critical pressure for convective deflagration [39].…”
Section: Simulation Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are simply the mean values of the donor material (PBX-9501) in the volume. The model for the mass conversion or mass burn rate is discussed below with full details provided in [4].…”
Section: Multi-materials Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where T 0 is the initial bulk solid temperature, κ is the thermal conductivity, E is the activation energy, R is the ideal gas constant C P is the specific heat, Q is the heat released and x r , x s are physical lengths [4].T s is a sub-scale surface temperature, not to be confused with T r or T s in Eqs. (3.4, 3.5, 3.8, 3.10).…”
Section: Multi-materials Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%