2015
DOI: 10.1109/tdsc.2014.2320714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Dependability Features for Real-Time Embedded Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…if (a i+1 ≤ Φ < a i ) then [6] traffic load level= i [7] break; [8] end [9] end [10] Select a working mode: Working mode = 1 intends to enhance the retainability of ongoing services while Working mode = 2 increases channel availability for new users. [11] if Working mode = 1 then [12] R = Rmax−traffic load level [13] end [14] if Working mode = 2 then…”
Section: A Dynamic Channel Reservation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…if (a i+1 ≤ Φ < a i ) then [6] traffic load level= i [7] break; [8] end [9] end [10] Select a working mode: Working mode = 1 intends to enhance the retainability of ongoing services while Working mode = 2 increases channel availability for new users. [11] if Working mode = 1 then [12] R = Rmax−traffic load level [13] end [14] if Working mode = 2 then…”
Section: A Dynamic Channel Reservation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, channel availability and service retainability which describe the properties of a system from a dependability perspective are two important metrics for performance evaluation in a CRN [10]. Note that the dependability of a communication system is defined as its ability to deliver services that can justifiably be trusted, when faced with failures of their components [11], [12]. One reason for which a system does not behave as it is specified can be, for instance, any fault in its design, or the failure of some of its components when facing with unpredicted changes in the system's environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of models and MDE in dependability engineering was highlighted by Gran et al (2007 ); Hamid et al (2008 ) and Biehl et al (2010 ), and confirmed in a recent empirical study on the state of modeling in the embedded domain ( Bernardi et al, 2012;Panesar-Walawege et al, 2013;Liebel et al, 2014;Ni et al, 2015 ) because code generation and simulation are heavily used; the use of modeling in that field has been reported as highly positive. In this context, ( Bernardi et al, 2012 ) proposed a UML profile compliant with MARTE ( OMG, 2011b ) to address dependability analysis and modeling.…”
Section: Model-driven Engineering and Domain-specific Languagementioning
confidence: 71%
“…Unfortunately, these processes offer little support for meeting dependability requirements. Over the years, research efforts have been invested in methodologies and techniques for dependable software engineering, although dedicated processes have been proposed only recently ( Bernardi et al, 2012;Panesar-Walawege et al, 2013;Ni et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Incorporating Dependability In System and Software Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UML metamodel includes many semantic variables and provides special constructors in the language for refinement. Such constructs, stereotypes, tagged values, and tags are used to define DSMLs based on UML [60]. As these capture domain-specific concepts, profiles are typically used together with other specific stereotypes of the same domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%