2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-010-0407-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling diameter distribution of Austrian black pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) plantations: a comparison of the Weibull frequency distribution function and percentile-based projection methods

Abstract: The main purpose of the present investigation is to examine and compare three methods for diameter distribution modeling in terms of their fitness to predict from stand level variables the diameter distributions of even-aged Austrian black pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) plantations in Bulgaria. The percentile-based projection method involving empirical probability density function based on 12 percentiles was the first method tested. A new modified approach based on the first method was proposed as the second alternat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among many PDFs, the two-parameter Weibull distribution is the most commonly chosen for modelling diameter distributions in forestry practices (Bailey & Dell, 1973;Borders, Souter, Bailey, & Ware, 1987;Calzado-Carretero & Torres-Alvarez, 2013;Cao, 2004;Gorgoso et al, 2007Gorgoso et al, , 2012Jiang & Brooks, 2009;Liu et al, 2009;McGarrigle, Kershaw, Lavigne, Weiskittel, & Ducey, 2011;Palahí et al, 2006Palahí et al, , 2007Qin, Cao, & Blouin, 2007;Stankova & Zlatanov, 2010;Zhang & Liu, 2006). The advantages of the Weibull distribution include its flexibility to fit shapes commonly found in both uneven-aged and even-aged stands and its easiness of computing probabilities without the need for numerical integration (Cao & McCarty, 2006).…”
Section: Diameter Distribution Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among many PDFs, the two-parameter Weibull distribution is the most commonly chosen for modelling diameter distributions in forestry practices (Bailey & Dell, 1973;Borders, Souter, Bailey, & Ware, 1987;Calzado-Carretero & Torres-Alvarez, 2013;Cao, 2004;Gorgoso et al, 2007Gorgoso et al, , 2012Jiang & Brooks, 2009;Liu et al, 2009;McGarrigle, Kershaw, Lavigne, Weiskittel, & Ducey, 2011;Palahí et al, 2006Palahí et al, , 2007Qin, Cao, & Blouin, 2007;Stankova & Zlatanov, 2010;Zhang & Liu, 2006). The advantages of the Weibull distribution include its flexibility to fit shapes commonly found in both uneven-aged and even-aged stands and its easiness of computing probabilities without the need for numerical integration (Cao & McCarty, 2006).…”
Section: Diameter Distribution Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The two-parameter Weibull function has therefore been reported to be the most simple and accurate for modelling diameter distributions for several tree species worldwide, such as birch (Betula alba) stands in northwestern Spain (Gorgoso, 2003;Gorgoso, Alvarez-Gonzalez, Rojo, & Grandas-Arias, 2007), sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) and other conifer species in Great Britain (Rennolls, Geary, & Rollinson, 1985), Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Norway Spruce (Picea abies) stands in Finland (Maltamo, Puumalainen, & Paivinen, 1995), Maritime Pine (Pinus pinaster) in Spain ( Alvarez-Gonz alez, 1997), Common Birch (Betula alba) in northwestern Spain (Gorgoso, 2003;Gorgoso et al, 2007), Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) in USA (Bullock & Burkhart, 2005), the eight most common tree species of Catalonia in Spain (P. sylvestris, Pinus uncinata, Pinus pinea, Pinus halepensis, Pinus nigra, Abies alba, Quercus ilex, and Quercus suber) (Palahí, Pukkala, & Trasobares, 2006), Austrian Black Pine (P. nigra) in Bulgaria (Stankova & Zlatanov, 2010), and Cork Oak (Q. suber L.) in Spain (Calzado-Carretero & Torres-Alvarez, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of moments (Shifley and Lentz, 1985;Nanang, 1998;Río, 1999;Stankova and Zlatanov, 2010) is based on the relationship between the parameters of the Weibull function and the first and second moments of the diameter distribution (arithmetic mean diameter and variance, respectively):…”
Section: -Methods Of Moments (Mmw)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such method has been previously applied (Nanang 1998, Del Río 1999, Stankova & Zlatanov 2010, Gorgoso et al 2012, and is based on the relationship between the parameters of the Weibull function and the first and second moments of the diameter distribution (mean diameter and variance, respectively -eqn. 13, eqn.…”
Section: The Weibull Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%