2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Drug Absorption from the Dermis after an Injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for the different results in the numerical simulation and experimental data comparison in the three drug delivery system may be as follows: in the transdermal delivery model, the drug delivery matrix and skin are assumed to be homogeneous isotropic materials, but in fact, the skin is composed of the cuticle, epidermis, and dermis. It is clear that its diffusion coefficient is not a constant, and the drug concentration measurement by microdialysis is generally located in the dermis [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Therefore, the numerical simulation results and experimental results will exhibit certain deviations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for the different results in the numerical simulation and experimental data comparison in the three drug delivery system may be as follows: in the transdermal delivery model, the drug delivery matrix and skin are assumed to be homogeneous isotropic materials, but in fact, the skin is composed of the cuticle, epidermis, and dermis. It is clear that its diffusion coefficient is not a constant, and the drug concentration measurement by microdialysis is generally located in the dermis [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Therefore, the numerical simulation results and experimental results will exhibit certain deviations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the lymphatic membrane is denoted as d l . We use an exponential function to represent the variation of opening width w with the pressure difference between the interstitial pressure and the lymphatics ∆p = p i − p l [26,44].…”
Section: Transvascular Fluid Flow and Solute Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opening width of the primary valves on the lymphatic vessels w is 10∼40 nm at the basal pressure and the width of the opening slit can reach as high as 64 nm at high interstitial pressure due to the injection according to the simulations in [44]. The baseline values for the parameters in the improved Kedem-Katchalsky model are shown in Table 1 [26,27,44,45]. The tissue and solute properties (such as hydraulic permeability and solute size) and injection process parameters (such as injection duration and volume) are inputs needed for the computational model, as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Transvascular Fluid Flow and Solute Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the effect the capillaries had on partitioning and diffusion was analyzed. The impact of the lymphatic vessels was also considered in these models, and lymphatic absorption after dermal injection has been recently modelled by Li et al [21]. A physiological interpretation of the capillaries was recently investigated in Calcutt and Anissimov [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%