2009
DOI: 10.3233/ip-2009-0168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling e-government business processes: New approaches to transparent and efficient performance

Abstract: Many governments worldwide are restructuring their business practices to improve their performances. To help describe and understand the process of restructuring, modeling techniques are used at different levels of modeling abstraction. This paper presents a new approach to the modeling of e-government business processes. It is based on two existing modeling techniques: Business Process Mapping (BPMapping) and UN/CEFACT Modeling Methodology (UMM). The BPMapping technique provides an overall graphical represent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Castellano et al (2005) • Oates (2003) • Torrubiano (2007) • Chourabi et al (2009) Pilot and evaluate…”
Section: Plan and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Castellano et al (2005) • Oates (2003) • Torrubiano (2007) • Chourabi et al (2009) Pilot and evaluate…”
Section: Plan and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an interest among several egov scholars how the introduction of IT will enable an improvement of governmental business processes; e.g. Andersen (2002), Scholl (2003), Becker et al (2006), Hughes et al (2006), Weerakkody et al (2006), Chourabi et al (2009) and Niehaves & Plattfaut (2010). This can comprise both the restructuring of work procedures and the relations to other stakeholders (Janssen & Cresswell, 2005;Axelsson et al, 2013;Cook & Harrison, 2015).…”
Section: Salient Features Of E-governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist several research endeavors in e-government that have explicitly applied a design research approach, e.g. Karacapilidis et al (2005), Olbrich & Simon (2008), Liu et al (2007), Chourabi et al (2009), Zwicker et al (2010) and Danneels & Viaene (2015). Policy has, more or less, been taken into account in these studies.…”
Section: E-government Research and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bottom-up process analysis employed by many BPR-related approaches [42] is very expensive and time-consuming. Hence, we posit that a top-down approach [41,43] is needed in order to account for the special needs of the domain of public administration.…”
Section: Proposition 3: Bpr Efforts Need To Be Initiated Top-down In mentioning
confidence: 99%