Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery &Amp; Data Mining 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3292500.3330896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Extreme Events in Time Series Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the distribution calculated by GEV even with a high dispersion for highest return period. Even if it is well known that deep learning-based methods may results in weak performance for extreme events (Zhang et al, 2019), the results obtained here…”
Section: Coupled Modelling Approach: Strength and Uncertaintiescontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…the distribution calculated by GEV even with a high dispersion for highest return period. Even if it is well known that deep learning-based methods may results in weak performance for extreme events (Zhang et al, 2019), the results obtained here…”
Section: Coupled Modelling Approach: Strength and Uncertaintiescontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Recent contributions address the topic of extreme values, such as the work of Siffer et al (2017), Ding et al (2019) and Wang et al (2019). Based on the formalisation or use of tools from extreme value theory (the first two references) or combinations of pairwise preference classification and ordinal ranking, they illustrate well the issues tackled in this paper.…”
Section: Recent Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siffer et al (2017) use an error rate based on the quantiles of the distribution and a ROC analysis on discretised values. Ding et al (2019) use the Root Mean Squared Error and the F-Score with discretised values. Wang et al (2019) use statistical distance metrics for distributions and ROC analysis on discretised values.…”
Section: Recent Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gated recurrent units (GRU) were first proposed by [49] as a simplified and efficient modification of traditional RNN and LSTM cells. GRU models have successfully been applied to sequence modelling problems in the past [50,51], which makes them good candidates as a benchmark model for our paper. Unlike LSTM, GRU only has two gates, the update gate and the reset gate; since there is no output gate, GRU has no control over the memory content of the unit.…”
Section: Long-term Short-term Memory and Gated Recurrent Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%