2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling farmer participation in agri-environmental nitrate pollution reducing schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
41
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is however in contrast with other adoption studies (Giovanopoulou et al, 2011;Hodge and Reader, 2010;Ma et al, 2012). These studies however cite high risks and high costs as the main reasons for low technology adoption among older and younger farmers respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…This finding is however in contrast with other adoption studies (Giovanopoulou et al, 2011;Hodge and Reader, 2010;Ma et al, 2012). These studies however cite high risks and high costs as the main reasons for low technology adoption among older and younger farmers respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Education increases the probability of joining the extension program. This is consistent with the notion that farmers with better human capital like education are among the early adopters (Gebreegziabher et al, 2011;Giovanopoulou, Nastis, & Papanagiotou, 2011). As hypothesized, all wealth indicator variables have significant effect on the probability of participation.…”
Section: Determinants Of Extension Program Participationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As expected education increases the probability of joining the extension program. This is consistent with the notion that farmers with better human capital like education are among the early adopters (Gebregziabher et al, 2011;Giovanopoulou et al, 2011). As hypothesized, wealth indicator variables except owned land size have significant effect on the probability of participation.…”
Section: Psm Analysissupporting
confidence: 78%