2004
DOI: 10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0785:mfcios>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Forest Cover Influences on Snow Accumulation, Sublimation, and Melt

Abstract: A comprehensive, physically based model of snow accumulation, redistribution, sublimation, and melt for open and forested catchments was assembled, based on algorithms derived from hydrological process research in Russia and Canada. The model was used to evaluate the long-term snow dynamics of a forested and an agricultural catchment in northwestern Russia without calibration from snow observations. The model was run with standard meteorological variables for the two catchments, and its results were tested aga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
137
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ground snow sublimation showed small differences between sites and was smaller than canopy snow interception. This finding corresponded to the results of Gelfan et al (2004) for a humid climate in Russia. The blowing snow sublimation loss in the domain was very small when compared to sublimation from canopy snow or ground snow.…”
Section: Effect Of Land Use On Snow Water Balance At the Plot Scalesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The ground snow sublimation showed small differences between sites and was smaller than canopy snow interception. This finding corresponded to the results of Gelfan et al (2004) for a humid climate in Russia. The blowing snow sublimation loss in the domain was very small when compared to sublimation from canopy snow or ground snow.…”
Section: Effect Of Land Use On Snow Water Balance At the Plot Scalesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Under-canopy snow distribution is governed by multiple factors that affect the energy environment, as observed by melting (Essery et al, 2008;Gelfan et al, 2004) and accumulation rates Schmidt and Gluns, 1991;Teti, 2003). Our results show different responses when comparing the snow-depth difference between open and canopycovered areas between study sites (Fig.…”
Section: Vegetation Effects On Snow Distribution Along Elevationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Snow processes are simulated using the method of Gelfan et al [32] as described in Huang [33]. Snow melting is calculated with a degree-day-factor.…”
Section: Soil and Water Integrated Model (Swim)mentioning
confidence: 99%