2006 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icit.2006.372220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Internet Delay Dynamics Using System Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the NCS is connected with a cyclic service network (IEEE 802.4, IEEE 802.5, PROFIBUS), then the delays are deterministic and easy to incorporate into the system model; however, if the NCS is built on a random access network (Ethernet, CAN), then the delays are caused by the package collisions and are of a stochastic nature, which naturally makes them more difficult to model and to take into account. Methods used to model the delays have ranged from conventional system identification tools [5], to using Markov chains [6], T-S fuzzy models [7], or ARMA models [8]. The compensation of the effects of this unwanted phenomenon has been done with many different approaches, such as: solving the problem as a LQG (Linear Quadratic Gaussian) problem [9]; modeling the delays as disturbances and posing the problem as a robust control problem, and thus trying to solve it with the respective existent tools [10]; introducing queues so as to represent the NCS as a time-invariant system [11]; using a state observer and a delay predictor and compensator, which relies on highly accurate modeling [12]; design of an event-based controller, which is therefore totally independent of the time delays [13].…”
Section: Networked Control Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the NCS is connected with a cyclic service network (IEEE 802.4, IEEE 802.5, PROFIBUS), then the delays are deterministic and easy to incorporate into the system model; however, if the NCS is built on a random access network (Ethernet, CAN), then the delays are caused by the package collisions and are of a stochastic nature, which naturally makes them more difficult to model and to take into account. Methods used to model the delays have ranged from conventional system identification tools [5], to using Markov chains [6], T-S fuzzy models [7], or ARMA models [8]. The compensation of the effects of this unwanted phenomenon has been done with many different approaches, such as: solving the problem as a LQG (Linear Quadratic Gaussian) problem [9]; modeling the delays as disturbances and posing the problem as a robust control problem, and thus trying to solve it with the respective existent tools [10]; introducing queues so as to represent the NCS as a time-invariant system [11]; using a state observer and a delay predictor and compensator, which relies on highly accurate modeling [12]; design of an event-based controller, which is therefore totally independent of the time delays [13].…”
Section: Networked Control Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They present a model for such systems and discuss the systems stability. Kamrani and Mehraban [12] propose a novel approach for modeling the end-to-end time-delay dynamics of the Internet using system identification and apply it to control real-time telerobotic operations via Internet with specific Quality of Service (QoS) offerings. Hespanha et al [13] focus on the advances made from 2003 to 2007, such as the approach of modeling NCSs by delayed differential equations (DDEs) and the switched systems approach.…”
Section: Time Delaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome this limitation, a general and reliable model of the internet delay dynamics and a stable control system platform to manipulate teleoperator via this communication link are required. It is very important to have a deeply understand the end-to-end internet delay dynamics as it directly affects on the quality of service (QoS) [23,24] in real-time applications. It also enable design and develop an efficient teleoperation control system for both real-time and offline applications.…”
Section: Description Of Internet Based On Its Qos Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose 20,20,1   for the UDP and UDP + TCP cases to minimize the AIC (Akaike's Information Theoretic Criterion) [23][24][25]. The AIC is defined as:…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%