2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24600-5_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Learner Affect with Theoretically Grounded Dynamic Bayesian Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This split implies that High SRL students are making mostly specific reflections, while Low SRL students are primarily un-reflective. Three groups were chosen to cover a larger gradient of SRL behaviors and because tertiary splits have been effective in other machine learning applications (Sabourin et al 2011a;). …”
Section: Srl Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This split implies that High SRL students are making mostly specific reflections, while Low SRL students are primarily un-reflective. Three groups were chosen to cover a larger gradient of SRL behaviors and because tertiary splits have been effective in other machine learning applications (Sabourin et al 2011a;). …”
Section: Srl Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D'Mello and colleagues achieved better than chance agreement to groundtruth labels provided by human video coders, distinguishing students' frustration, boredom, confusion, and flow from each other. Conati andMaclaren (2009) andSabourin, Mott, andLester (2011) used a combination of interaction data and questionnaire data to infer a range of affective states. More recent work by Baker and colleagues (2012) found that better agreement to ground-truth labels could be achieved by explicitly using data from automated detectors of student disengaged behaviors when predicting affect.…”
Section: The Difference Between Generic Model Parameters and The Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crystal Island has served as a platform for investigating a range of artificial intelligence technologies for dynamically supporting students' learning experiences. This includes work on narrative-centered tutorial planning (Lee, Mott, and Lester 2012;Mott and Lester 2006), student knowledge modeling (Rowe and Lester 2010), student goal recognition (Ha et al 2011), and affect recognition models (Sabourin, Mott, and Lester 2011). The environment has also been the subject of extensive empirical investigations of student learning and presence , with results informing the design and revision of successive iterations of the system.…”
Section: The Crystal Island Learning Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elliot and Pekrun's model of learner emotions was used as a theoretical foundation for structuring a sensor-free affect detection model (Sabourin, Mott, and Lester 2011). This model was empirically learned from a corpus of student interaction data.…”
Section: Modeling Student Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation