2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling loading rate effect on crushing stress of metallic cellular materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic friction coefficient was assumed to be 0.2. It was found that the simulation results were not sensitive to the friction coefficient through simple parametric study (Ma et al, 2009;Li and Meng, 2002). In the simulation, we adopted the explicit way and did not use any the mass scaling method, while just endowed the impact plate with a certain constant velocity.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dynamic friction coefficient was assumed to be 0.2. It was found that the simulation results were not sensitive to the friction coefficient through simple parametric study (Ma et al, 2009;Li and Meng, 2002). In the simulation, we adopted the explicit way and did not use any the mass scaling method, while just endowed the impact plate with a certain constant velocity.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models had different ratio of the length H to the width L. L d for the models were large enough. Nominal stress and nominal strain were commonly defined in the literatures (Li et al, 2014;Zheng et al, 2005;Ma et al, 2009) as…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the work of different researchers, it was easily found that the honeycomb, if used as a filler, can absorb a lot of energy (quasi-static and dynamic) when subjected to axial loadings. However, the dynamic compressive strength of honeycomb is found better than the antipodal quasi-static one [11][12][13][14]. The axial crushing resistance of honeycomb filled square tube was studied by Santosa [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing study pay much attention to the former two aspects. Some researchers point that the dynamic stress enhancement in metal foams under dynamic impact is mainly caused by inertia effect, other than strain rate effect of base material [3,4], however, some other researchers hold the opposite point [5,6]. As for the stress wave propagation, some idealized stress strain models, such as RPPL, RLHPL, EPPL etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%