2021
DOI: 10.1080/1351847x.2021.1957699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling market fluctuations under investor sentiment with a Hawkes-Contact process

Abstract: We present a new Hawkes-Contact model that combines a Hawkes process and a finite range contact process in order to model the stock price movements, especially under the impact of news and other information flows that could lead to contagious effects. To fully capture the underlying price process, we take the Hawkes process to track the full pathway of historical prices on their future movements and the contact process to capture the impact from news/investment sentiment. We compare this full model to a univar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is shown in Table 3, most SNSs focus on static networks with no attributes, which are categorised as G1/G2a models and characterised with the lowest level of complexity in each dimension. They generate networks based on predetermined network statistics and connection principles about topology [4], [5], [13], [15]- [19], [23]- [36], [41], [53]- [57]. Some other SNSs, with higher level of structural complexity, incorporate node attributes [7], [37]- [39], edge attributes [22], [52] or both of them [43]- [45] into the generation process of static networks.…”
Section: Complexity Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is shown in Table 3, most SNSs focus on static networks with no attributes, which are categorised as G1/G2a models and characterised with the lowest level of complexity in each dimension. They generate networks based on predetermined network statistics and connection principles about topology [4], [5], [13], [15]- [19], [23]- [36], [41], [53]- [57]. Some other SNSs, with higher level of structural complexity, incorporate node attributes [7], [37]- [39], edge attributes [22], [52] or both of them [43]- [45] into the generation process of static networks.…”
Section: Complexity Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another type of simulation-based networks, the principlebased simulations, are built according to different connection principles like homophily [148], [149], triadic structure [149], geographic proximity [152], [159]. These networks have typically higher degrees of temporal and dynamics complexity than statistics-based network simulations as they self-evolve with highly autonomous and interpretable edge formation process and generate temporal networked information.…”
Section: B: Data-driven Vs Simulation-based Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is shown in Table 3, most SNSs focus on static networks with no attributes, which G1/G2a [6], [20], [80], [24], [2], [3], [85], [55], [71], [73], [86], [84], [75][77], [78], [31], [40], [27], [68], [21], [1], [9], [83], [59], [33], [39], [10], [32], [57], [11], [30], [23], [53], [36], [5], [74] [18], [54] [49], [52], [79], [70] G2b/G3 [34], [69], [87], [51] [4], [7], [8], [72], [28], [76] [4],…”
Section: G1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another type of simulation-based networks, the principlebased simulations, are built according to different connection principles like homophily [142], [143], triadic structure [143], geographic proximity [146], [153]. These networks have typically higher degrees of temporal and dynamics complexity than statistics-based network simulations as they self-evolve with highly autonomous and interpretable edge formation process and generate temporal networked information.…”
Section: A How To Represent Networked Datamentioning
confidence: 99%