1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00301139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling mixed-mode dynamic crack propagation nsing finite elements: Theory and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
96
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in the case under consideration, the secant matrix S X i n+1 is symmetric. Comparing expressions (22) and (25) it is obvious that both methods can be implemented similarly, the only difference being the use of the tangent or secant matrix.…”
Section: Algebraic Implementation Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, in the case under consideration, the secant matrix S X i n+1 is symmetric. Comparing expressions (22) and (25) it is obvious that both methods can be implemented similarly, the only difference being the use of the tangent or secant matrix.…”
Section: Algebraic Implementation Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details on the algebraic tangent system of equations (22) are given in references [37,36]. The algebraic secant system of equations (25) reads:…”
Section: Algebraic Implementation Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While early work focused on various node release techniques and on the development of special singular elements moving with the crack tip (Atluri and Nishioka, 1985), recent work has included the introduction of special adaptive h-p methods for hyperbolic systems (Safjan and Oden, 1993) and of Eulerian-Lagrangian formulations to better cope with the continuously changing geometry (Koh et al, 1988). To study the spontaneous out-of-plane motion of two-dimensional dynamically propagating cracks, Swenson and Ingraffea (1988) used remeshing and interactive graphics to control the mesh distortion, while, more recently, Xu and Needleman (1994) introduced a cohesive surface constitutive relation allowing for the creation of new free surfaces along a family of possible fracture directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rock, concrete, ceramics, etc. Many models have been developed in the field of computational fracture mechanics, such as linear and nonlinear elastic fracture mechanics based methods (Bittencourt et al, 1996;Ingraffea and Manu, 1980;Swenson and Ingraffea, 1988), the extended finite element method (XFEM) (Belytschko and Black, 1999;Karihaloo and Xiao, 2003;Melenk and Babuška, 1996;Sukumar and Prévost, 2003), the cohesive-zone model (Bocca et al, 1991;de Borst, 2003) and meshless methods, such as the element free Galerkin method (EFGM) (Bordas et al, 2008;Fleming et al, 1997). Moreover, discontinuumbased numerical methods that are originally used for granular materials, such as the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method (Das and Cleary, 2010;Gray et al, 2001;Ma et al, 2011) and the discrete element method (DEM) (Cundall and Strack, 1979;Morris et al, 2004;Shi and Goodman, 1985) have also become increasingly popular in fracture modelling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%