2011
DOI: 10.1509/jmr.07.0359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Multichannel Home Video Demand in the U.S. Motion Picture Industry

Abstract: The U.S. motion picture industry has become increasingly reliant on posttheatrical channel profits. Two often-cited drivers of these profits are cross-channel substitution among posttheatrical channels and seasonality in consumer preferences for any movie. The authors use a differentiated products version of the multiplicative competitive interaction model to investigate these two phenomena. They estimate the model using data from 2000 and 2001 on two posttheatrical channels in the U.S. market: purchase and re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Lang, Switzer and Swartz (2011) find evidence of relatively price inelastic demand for home movie consumption via DVD, while De Roos and McKenzie (2014) find evidence of relatively high price elasticity of demand at the cinema box office. Even among segments of consumers, Mukherjee and Kadiyali (2011) find evidence that those with stronger preferences for movies with higher theatrical revenues and advertising expenditures tend to be less price sensitive than average. Given varying evidence on the price elasticity of demand in this context, relatively simple strategies of price discrimination such as bundling and two-part tariffs have been advocated in the literature (Shiller and Waldfogel, 2011;.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, Lang, Switzer and Swartz (2011) find evidence of relatively price inelastic demand for home movie consumption via DVD, while De Roos and McKenzie (2014) find evidence of relatively high price elasticity of demand at the cinema box office. Even among segments of consumers, Mukherjee and Kadiyali (2011) find evidence that those with stronger preferences for movies with higher theatrical revenues and advertising expenditures tend to be less price sensitive than average. Given varying evidence on the price elasticity of demand in this context, relatively simple strategies of price discrimination such as bundling and two-part tariffs have been advocated in the literature (Shiller and Waldfogel, 2011;.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 94%
“…20The overidentification test for the IVs yields a p -value that is greater than .99, indicating that the data do not have strong evidence that the IVs are not valid. To test whether our main finding is robust to the IVs for the nesting parameters and the specific parameterization of the nested PD model, we estimate several simplified models without using those IVs, following Mukherjee and Kadiyali (2011). The results appear in the Web Appendix, and our main finding holds.…”
Section: Demand Model Estimation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, the proposed NL model investigates the systematic heterogeneity by specifying the socioeconomic variables in the utility function. Further study could specify the explanatory variables as a random coefficient to catch the random heterogeneity for an NL model or measure the traveler's attitudes toward service quality to account for the latent effect of mode choice behavior .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%