2012
DOI: 10.5504/bbeq.2012.0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Batch Alcohol Fermentation with Free and Immobilized YeastsSaccharomyces Cerevisiae46 EVD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
35
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not easy to choose a single best fitting. In order to choose the best model it is import ant to consider how well it describes the transition from ex ponential t o stationary phase of t he process model (Kostov et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not easy to choose a single best fitting. In order to choose the best model it is import ant to consider how well it describes the transition from ex ponential t o stationary phase of t he process model (Kostov et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional β-term for retained biomass introduced in the differential equation for product, which is adjusted with an effectiveness factor η P [35][36][37] that stands for the relative difference between non-growth associated production of lactate from free and retained cells. Finally, the model to describe fixed-bed cultivations consists of the following set of differential equations:…”
Section: Model Development For Biomass Substrate and Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, some authors have employed different interpretations of the dimensionless, internal effectiveness factor η, which ranges from 0 to 1 and was originally postulated by Thiele to describe reaction rates affected by diffusion limitations within carriers. Up to date, this factor has successfully been used for immobilized ethanol fermentations with yeasts wherein η was used in different works to describe the efficiency of the immobilized biocatalyst versus free biocatalyst with respect to biomass formation [35], substrate consumption [36] and ethanol production [35,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operating conditions were 1.0 mL/min flow rate, 30 C temperature, 210 nm wavelength and 10 mL injection volume. The metabolite product yield coefficients (Yp/s, mg/g) were calculated as follows [24]:…”
Section: Metabolite Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%