2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-019-2430-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Buckling Restrained Braces (BRBs) using Full-Scale Experimental Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guo et al [12] and Cao et al [17] utilized a friction coefficient of 0.1 for the interaction between the steel core and concrete encasing. Avci-Karatas et al [16] used a friction coefficient of 0.03 for the interaction between the steel core and concrete encasing where a teflon pad was utilized. Chou and Chen [13]and Heidary-Torkamani et al [15]selected friction coefficient as 0.1 for the steel core and steel encasing where grease oil was utilized.…”
Section: Figure 1typical Buckling Restrained Bracementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Guo et al [12] and Cao et al [17] utilized a friction coefficient of 0.1 for the interaction between the steel core and concrete encasing. Avci-Karatas et al [16] used a friction coefficient of 0.03 for the interaction between the steel core and concrete encasing where a teflon pad was utilized. Chou and Chen [13]and Heidary-Torkamani et al [15]selected friction coefficient as 0.1 for the steel core and steel encasing where grease oil was utilized.…”
Section: Figure 1typical Buckling Restrained Bracementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heidary-Torkamani et al [15] utilized a gap size of 6 mm between the tubed steel core and tubed steel encasing. [8] In the literature, limited studies [6,9,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] are available on numerical modeling of BRBs. The reason for this can be attributed to the complexity of modeling interaction between the steel core and encasing, which leads to significant convergence problems and computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary use case for the friction coefficient in BRBs is to numerically simulate the effects of higher-mode buckling of the core plate using nonlinear finite-element software, such as LS-Dyna, Abaqus, and Ansys. However, owing to a lack of direct friction data, current practice is to adopt a Coulomb friction model calibrated against peak BRB forces (Avci- Karatas et al 2019;Budaházy and Dunai 2015;Chen et al 2016;Guo et al 2017;Stratan et al 2020). These constant friction coefficients have varied from μ ¼ 0.03 to 0.5, but μ ¼ 0.1 is the most common estimate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, to the knowledge of the authors, such comprehensive data assessed here are unique and beneficial for the studies on the hazard and risk assessment strategies to mitigate seismic damage in 29%-66% possible strong earthquake (Mw≥7.0) affecting the south of Istanbul with rupturing beneath the sea of Marmara in the next 14 years [18][19]. When viewed from this aspect, this work will be a remarkable contribution to the existing knowledge base for the engineers about the estimation of buildings damage levels after a large-scale earthquake disaster [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%