Modeling of Business Systems Using SOM

Ferstl, Otto K.; Sinz, Elmar J.

doi:10.1007/3-540-26661-5_15

Cited by 28 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From the other direction, such research might suggest avenues for making DEMO more accessible and usable by business professionals. Similar efforts could explore relationships between WST and a number of other tools and methods for IT professionals, including Archimate (Lankhorst et al, 2009), MEMO (Frank, 2002), semantic object models (Ferstl and Sinz, 2006), and e3 value (Gordijn & Akkermans, 2003).…”

Section: Linkage Of Wst and Its Extensions To Concepts Models And Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

Work System Theory as a Platform: Response to a Research Perspective Article by Niederman and March

Alter

2015

JAIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Linkage Of Wst and Its Extensions To Concepts Models And Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

Work System Theory as a Platform: Response to a Research Perspective Article by Niederman and March

Alter

2015

JAIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Therefore, SOM is a suitable candidate for the evaluation of MUVIEMOT in general and the transformation algorithm in particular. The case study concentrates on the business process (bp) layer of SOM (Ferstl and Sinz, .2006). The creation of SOM bp modelling utilizes a system-oriented multiview modelling approach (Bork and Sinz, 2013).…”

Section: Case Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Model-Driven Development of Multi-View Modelling Tools: The MUVIEMOT Approach

Karagiannis¹,

Bork²

2014

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Paradigm Trends

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As the complexity of modern computer and enterprise systems is ever increasing due to emerging technologies and the need to integrate different systems, modelling tools, designed to encourage modellers in creating models according to the complex reality are of rising importance. Multi-view modelling methods (MVMM) can cope with this complexity by providing visualization, decomposition, and specialization functionality. The creation of a model is decomposed into the creation of several views and integrating them in order to derive the whole model of the system. Keeping the multiple views consistent and providing suitable visualization means is vital for applicability and usability of MVMMs. By contrast, when designing such tools, one is forced to adopt conventional software engineering approaches. The paper at hand tries to contribute filling that research gap by introducing a model-driven approach, tailored to the specifics of designing multi-view modelling tools. A prototypical implementation of the approach enables automatic generation of modelling tools for MVMM using the ADOxx meta modelling platform.

show abstract

“…Enterprise models are built from modeling concepts [3, p. 251], defined in modeling languages, which constitute abstractions of organizational aspects (organizational action systems) and information systems (IS) [1, p. 942]. Examples of enterprise modeling methods include ArchiMate [4], Architecture of Integrated Information Systems (ARIS) [5], Business Engineering (BE) [6], Design and Engineering Methodology for Organizations (DEMO) [7,8], For Enterprise Modeling Method (4EM; formerly Enterprise Knowledge Development) [9,10], Multi-Perspective Enterprise Modeling (MEMO) [1,11,12], Semantic Object Model (SOM) [13], The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) [14], and Work System Theory (WST) [15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Analysis of Selected Enterprise Modeling Approaches

Böck

Kaczmarek

Overbeek

et al. 2014

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Complexity inherent to the management of organizational action recommends the use of instruments that support the structured description and analysis of organizations. A variety of enterprise modeling (EM) methods have been developed to serve these purposes. To contribute to the elucidation of their conceptual differences, overlaps, and focal points, this paper analyzes four selected EM methods based on a designed analysis framework. It includes an assessment of the methods' key goals and purposes, central assumptions, and concepts. The paper concludes with a suggestion of future research topics.

show abstract

Modeling of Business Systems Using SOM

Cited by 28 publications

References 4 publications

Work System Theory as a Platform: Response to a Research Perspective Article by Niederman and March

Work System Theory as a Platform: Response to a Research Perspective Article by Niederman and March

Model-Driven Development of Multi-View Modelling Tools: The MUVIEMOT Approach

A Comparative Analysis of Selected Enterprise Modeling Approaches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About