2017
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14101163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Chromium, Copper, Zinc, Arsenic and Lead Using Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer Based on Discrete Wavelet Transform

Abstract: A modeling method based on discrete wavelet transform (DWT) was introduced to analyze the concentration of chromium, copper, zinc, arsenic and lead in soil with a portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer. A total of 111 soil samples were collected and observed. Denoising and baseline correction were performed on each spectrum before modeling. The optimum conditions for pre-processing were denoising with Coiflet 3 on the 3rd level and baseline correction with Coiflet 3 on the 9th level. Calibration curves… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique has a wide range of quantifications, having detection limits poorer than those of large laboratory-based XRF instruments or of ICP techniques, but it is sufficient for environmental monitoring of a large number of elements that can be determined simultaneously [12,13]. Despite lower detection limits of the chemical methods, sometimes these become more imprecise and inaccurate than XRF spectrometry, mainly due to the fact that the latter requires virtually no sample pretreatment [14]. There are approved protocols for using this instrument in soils and sediments [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique has a wide range of quantifications, having detection limits poorer than those of large laboratory-based XRF instruments or of ICP techniques, but it is sufficient for environmental monitoring of a large number of elements that can be determined simultaneously [12,13]. Despite lower detection limits of the chemical methods, sometimes these become more imprecise and inaccurate than XRF spectrometry, mainly due to the fact that the latter requires virtually no sample pretreatment [14]. There are approved protocols for using this instrument in soils and sediments [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an effective signal processing method, wavelet transform can not only peel off the characteristic peaks and get a background sum closer to the background [33], but also effectively reduce the measured spectral noise [34].…”
Section: Iterative Discrete Wavelet Transform (Idwt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al used discrete wavelet transform (DWT) to subtract the background of the XRF spectrum to analyse the concentration of elements Cr, Cu, Zn, As and Pb in soil. 19 DWT is a multi-resolution analysis method that can extract spectral background. However, it cannot completely distinguish the overlapping parts of signals in wavelet space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%