2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of coupled thermodynamic and geomechanical performance of underground compressed air energy storage in lined rock caverns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this modeling effort, we used TOUGH-FLAC coupled analysis (Rutqvist, 2011), following a modeling approach and setup recently used by Kim et al (2012) and Rutqvist et al (2012) on an equivalent CAES system. The principles of TOUGH-FLAC coupled analysis are shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluation Of Edz Influence On Geomechanical Stabimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this modeling effort, we used TOUGH-FLAC coupled analysis (Rutqvist, 2011), following a modeling approach and setup recently used by Kim et al (2012) and Rutqvist et al (2012) on an equivalent CAES system. The principles of TOUGH-FLAC coupled analysis are shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluation Of Edz Influence On Geomechanical Stabimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model geometry and grid were similar to that used in Kim et al (2012) and Rutqvist et al, (2012), except for EDZ thickness and properties, which have since been updated based on investigation at the pilot test cavern ( Figure 9). It is a 2D model domain, corresponding to a 1 m thick vertical cross-section through the storage cavern, with a radius of 2.5 m, and with thicknesses for the concrete lining and EDZ of 0.5 and 0.6 m, respectively.…”
Section: Analysis Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The excavated cavern could be located at a shallower depth if the unstable ground conditions after excavation can be stabilized through various support systems and injected air can be perfectly stored inside the lining. Indeed, the improvement around the cavern significantly reduces the additional cost and provides benefits of selecting the potential sites [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underground storage in unlined caverns has numerous advantages over aboveground storage (Morfeldt, 1974;Bergman, 1984;Broms and Zhao, 1993;Zhao et al, 1996Zhao et al, , 1999Zhao et al, , 2004Sun and Zhao, 2010;Rutqvist et al, 2012), for instance, larger storage capacity, longer service life, and less resource consumption. Meanwhile, the underground storage is safe from extreme conditions such as fire, earthquake and explosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%