1993
DOI: 10.1109/16.249480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of minority-carrier transport in nonuniformly doped silicon regions with asymptotic expansions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that, for W = 0.2 µm, the QNQE model and the expression (20a) give accurate results provided that S is less than S C (∼10 5 cm s −1 ), while in the case of transparent model and (or) solution (20b) S must be greater than S C to ensure accuracy with respect to the exact numerical solution [10]. Therefore, if we rely on one of the three average value solutions, it requires the use of (29) to achieve a satisfactory accuracy over the same range of S.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is clear that, for W = 0.2 µm, the QNQE model and the expression (20a) give accurate results provided that S is less than S C (∼10 5 cm s −1 ), while in the case of transparent model and (or) solution (20b) S must be greater than S C to ensure accuracy with respect to the exact numerical solution [10]. Therefore, if we rely on one of the three average value solutions, it requires the use of (29) to achieve a satisfactory accuracy over the same range of S.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this study, we use the following hole lifetime, mobility, and apparent band-gap narrowing physical models of Del Alamo et al [14]: Figure 2 shows the variation of the emitter saturation current density J oe = J p (0)/u(0) against the emitter surface-recombination velocity S, calculated from transparent model [7], quasi-neutral quasiequilibrium model (QNQE) [8], expressions (20a), (20b), and (29), and exact numerical results [10].…”
Section: Physical Models Used In the Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between the two curves can be explained by the work of Rinaldi [28], who has demonstrated that the approximation of the transparent emitter model is valuable only for a thin emitter and for a high surface recombination velocity. In his second work [18], he has demonstrated that the effective recombination velocity, related to the polysilicon contacted emitter, decreases when the oxide thickness increases and consequently, the approximation of the transparent single-crystal emitter can not give accurate results.…”
Section: Effect Of the Polysilicon Thickness On The Normalised Currenmentioning
confidence: 99%