2017
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201715304010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Radiotherapy Linac Source Terms Using ARCHER Monte Carlo Code: Performance Comparison for GPU and MIC Parallel Computing Devices

Abstract: Abstract. Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is well recognized as the most accurate method for radiation dose calculations. For radiotherapy applications, accurate modelling of the source term, i.e. the clinical linear accelerator is critical to the simulation. The purpose of this paper is to perform source modelling and examine the accuracy and performance of the models on Intel Many Integrated Core coprocessors (aka Xeon Phi) and Nvidia GPU using ARCHER and explore the potential optimization methods. Phase Space-b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of authors describe the use of a graphics processing unit (GPU) to increase the parallelism of the computation. 41 This approach is pursued by Jia et al,who describe the implementation of the DPM code on GPU, with one to two orders of magnitude speedup compared to a single-thread implementation. 42,43 Townson et al 44 describe simplified phase-space models for this implementation, so as to avoid the time overhead associated with reading a large phase-space file.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of authors describe the use of a graphics processing unit (GPU) to increase the parallelism of the computation. 41 This approach is pursued by Jia et al,who describe the implementation of the DPM code on GPU, with one to two orders of magnitude speedup compared to a single-thread implementation. 42,43 Townson et al 44 describe simplified phase-space models for this implementation, so as to avoid the time overhead associated with reading a large phase-space file.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors describe the use of a graphics processing unit (GPU) to increase the parallelism of the computation 41 . This approach is pursued by Jia et al., who describe the implementation of the DPM code on GPU, with one to two orders of magnitude speedup compared to a single‐thread implementation 42,43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we combined GPU-accelerated MC simulations and organ autosegmentation techniques to evaluate rapidly the organ dose for a specific patient based on PET/CT images. In our previous work, a dedicated GPU-based MC code, ARCHER (Su et al 2014), has been validated for a wide range of medical physics applications, such as CT imaging and radiotherapy (Xu et al 2015, Adam et al 2020, Lin et al 2017. Here, ARCHER's capabilities are extended by adding a new NM module dedicated to internal dosimetry for patients undergoing PET/CT examination involving 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accelerate the simulation process, they simplified the transport physics or introduced GPU or multithread CPU techniques. Xu 18 adopted a GPU technique and developed an MC package called ARCHER to compute dose deposition under a magnetic field. Although the computational efficiency improved to some extent through aforementioned GPU or CPU acceleration or with variance reduction techniques, the high‐efficiency requirements of iterative invoking during plan optimization under the online treatment circumstance were hardly met.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%