2004
DOI: 10.1080/10408340490888607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Uptake of Xenobiotics in Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zebrowski et al found that the systemicity of xenobiotics was related to the physical and chemical properties of the agent, the growth period of plants, or other conditions. 25 In addition, the concentrations of the two treatment groups were similar, and thus there was no significant difference between the two results. The systemicity of pesticides mainly depended on their physical and chemical properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zebrowski et al found that the systemicity of xenobiotics was related to the physical and chemical properties of the agent, the growth period of plants, or other conditions. 25 In addition, the concentrations of the two treatment groups were similar, and thus there was no significant difference between the two results. The systemicity of pesticides mainly depended on their physical and chemical properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The balance between uptake and metabolism may provide an explanation for this phenomenon. 24 The transmission of pesticides in plants mainly depends on transpiration flow, 25 and the content of triflumezopyrim in the third leaf was higher than that in the first or second leaf (Figure 2) within 72 h, which means that triflumezopyrim had acropetal direction in rice.…”
Section: Optimization Of Extraction Ofmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Reviews exist on general biological treatment of indoor air which include active biofiltration, but also deals to some extent with potted plants (Guieysse et al 2008;Soreanu et al 2013). In addition, there are several reviews on bioremediation and phytoremediation which focus on remediation of soils (Arthur et al 2005;Juwarkar et al 2010;McGuinness and Dowling 2009;Salt et al 1998), as well as reviews of modelling on xenobiotic accumulation in edible plants (Collins and Finnegan 2010;Trapp 2004;Zebrowski et al 2004). Recently, a review has been published dealing with deposition of atmospheric PAHs in plants (Desalme et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of MBOA translocation, there was evidence of behavior usually found in the dynamics of absorption of xenobiotics by plants [28]. There is an increase in concentration to relatively constant levels in the root and a gradually increasing concentration in the shoot, although this behavior may vary depending on the species studied and the compound being absorbed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The allelochemical concentrations measured in the root and the shoot represent a time-dependent phytotoxic effect. It is generally considered that the maximum rates of absorption and detoxification are measured during the early stages of development of the plant [28]. Given this fact, the values of the root/shoot concentration ratio for different weeds for a treatment time of one day (Figure 4, bar graph) were compared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%