2016 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/isemc.2016.7571683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling optimization of test patterns used in de-embedding method for through silicon via (TSV) measurement in silicon interposer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chip-package-system board integrated simulation can provide analytical insights of internal states once models are properly prepared for electronic components including IC chips [19]- [21]. Packaging materials are electrically characterized for modeling passive impedance [22], [23]. The simulation concatenates the passive models and active circuits to solve dynamic behaviors of powering and signaling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chip-package-system board integrated simulation can provide analytical insights of internal states once models are properly prepared for electronic components including IC chips [19]- [21]. Packaging materials are electrically characterized for modeling passive impedance [22], [23]. The simulation concatenates the passive models and active circuits to solve dynamic behaviors of powering and signaling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, some potential sources of error are hypothesized and overcome by proposing solutions based on a de‐embedding plane that can ensure a TEM (or quasi‐TEM) mode propagation 6,7 . In particular, in reference 8, the electrical performance of the test patterns used in the de‐embedding method for DUT characterization was studied thoroughly and for all test patterns, and full wave models were built and then analyzed based on simulated electrical performances. About analytical methods, Chen 9 has shown that the de‐embedding procedures are sensitive to manufacturing variations in the test fixtures, as well as inaccuracies associated with the calibration and measurement process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%