2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling production and decay of coarse woody debris in loblolly pine plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(48 reference statements)
1
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These factors form the basis for most predictive forest wood decay models (Müller-Using and Bartsch 2009; Radtke et al 2009;Yin 1999;Zell et al 2009). These large-scale models do not account for the variation in wood decay rates at smaller temporal and spatial scales (Onega and Eickmeier 1991;Palviainen et al 2010;Van der Wal et al 2007;Woodall 2010).…”
Section: Future Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors form the basis for most predictive forest wood decay models (Müller-Using and Bartsch 2009; Radtke et al 2009;Yin 1999;Zell et al 2009). These large-scale models do not account for the variation in wood decay rates at smaller temporal and spatial scales (Onega and Eickmeier 1991;Palviainen et al 2010;Van der Wal et al 2007;Woodall 2010).…”
Section: Future Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest floor biomass accumulation (B F ; Mg·ha −1 ) was determined as in Gonzalez-Benecke et al [24] as the sum of yearly litterfall inputs corrected for decay loss using an equation to estimate decay rate of the forest floor [25]. This equation used site coordinates (latitude and longitude, in decimal units) as inputs to estimate decay rate and was in good agreement with decay rates reported for southern pines in the southeastern U.S. [26][27][28].…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each literature value, the reported initial stand characteristics such as planting density, SI and management activities (site preparation, weed control, fertilization and thinning) were used as model inputs. Loblolly pine's T C , AG C and BG C were validated in two ways, depending on the availability of information: (i) whole-model validation, using reports that included planting density, SI and management activities [25,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]; or (ii) allometry validation, using reports where SI was not reported [27,[49][50][51][52][53]. The former enabled us to run the model from planting year to age when biomass was determined.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest management can have a large impact on the production and yield of CWD in terrestrial ecosystems (Debeljak 2006;Radtke et al 2009). The amount of CWD (22.01 m 3 .ha -1 ) in the unmanaged stands of this study was lower than that found in studies such as those of Habashi (1998) or Sefidi and MarvieMohadjer (2010), and was higher than that found by Zolfaghari (2005), in Caspian forest sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantity and quality of CWD are fundamental characteristics for increasing our knowledge of natural forest stand dynamics (Motta et al 2006). Forest management can have large impacts on the production and yield of CWD in terrestrial ecosystems (Debeljak 2006;Radtke et al 2009), especially in forest ecosystems (Jenkins et al 2004). This study compares the amount of CWD in managed and unmanaged forest ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%