2023
DOI: 10.3390/f14020195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Productivity and Estimating Costs of Processor Tower Yarder in Shelterwood Cutting of Pine Stand

Abstract: Cable-based yarding technology has had a long tradition on steep slopes in Europe, and the new implementation of yarding functions in recent decades favored operational efficiency and lower extraction costs. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Syncrofalke 3t truck-mounted Processor Tower Yarder (PTY) on steep terrain, in coniferous forests managed with the shelterwood system. In particular, the aim was to determine PTY productivity and costs, with attention to parameters that cou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model for pulling out the cable, on the other hand, had a much bigger slope, which applied to a lateral yarding distance range of approximately 120 m in the original study. These, as well as the findings of other studies which involved cable work [33], point out the same idea, namely, that the efficiency of manual work is lower in transportation processes compared to that of machine work. When one compares the potential noise exposure, however, the findings are not similar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The model for pulling out the cable, on the other hand, had a much bigger slope, which applied to a lateral yarding distance range of approximately 120 m in the original study. These, as well as the findings of other studies which involved cable work [33], point out the same idea, namely, that the efficiency of manual work is lower in transportation processes compared to that of machine work. When one compares the potential noise exposure, however, the findings are not similar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%