2009
DOI: 10.1080/00045600902931785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Settlement Patterns of the Late Classic Maya Civilization with Bayesian Methods and Geographic Information Systems

Abstract: The ancient Maya occupied tropical lowland Mesoamerica and farmed successfully to support an elaborate settlement pattern that developed over many centuries. There has been debate as to the foundation of the settlement patterns. We show that Maya settlement locations were strongly influenced by environmental factors, primarily topographic slope, soil fertility, and soil drainage properties. Maps of these characteristics were created at the local scale and combined using Bayesian weights-of-evidence methods to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 shows contrast values, which indicate the relationship between "distance to major roads" and deforestation (that is, the change from current forest to unstocked forest). Contrast is the difference between the positive and negative weights (derived from the "weights of evidence" analysis) that is used to measure the correlation between a particular forest cover change and sampled training points for each variable [40]. Positive contrast values (above zero) indicate that areas within the 10,000 m distance ranges are more suscpetible to deforestation, while negative contrast values (below zero) show that areas over 10,000 m distance ranges are less susceptible to deforestation [35].…”
Section: Model Calibration and Simulation Runmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 shows contrast values, which indicate the relationship between "distance to major roads" and deforestation (that is, the change from current forest to unstocked forest). Contrast is the difference between the positive and negative weights (derived from the "weights of evidence" analysis) that is used to measure the correlation between a particular forest cover change and sampled training points for each variable [40]. Positive contrast values (above zero) indicate that areas within the 10,000 m distance ranges are more suscpetible to deforestation, while negative contrast values (below zero) show that areas over 10,000 m distance ranges are less susceptible to deforestation [35].…”
Section: Model Calibration and Simulation Runmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique was later extended to determining animal habitats, archaeology, environmental impact evaluation, risk assessment and also used in wildfire prediction (Dickson et al, 2006;Ford, Clarke, & Raines, 2009;Ilia, Tsangaratos, Koumantakis, & Rozos, 2017;Lv, Zheng, Zhao, & Hu, 2013;Raines & Bonham-Carter, 2007;Romero-Calcerrada, Novillo, Millington, & Gomez-Jimenez, 2008, 2010Tahmassebipoor, Rahmati, Noormohamadi, & Lee, 2016;Weed, 2005). The method assumes that an event occurs at a set of known presence points and uses evidence from multiple evidential themes that might cause the event expressed in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accessibility to the water sources, especially to the surface streams, is one of the most important factors in prediction of ancient settlements locations (Bátora and Tóth, 2014;Ford et al, 2009;Van Leusen et al, 2005;Lieskovský, 2011); the location of the streams themselves is important for archaeohydrological modelling of floods (Arnaud-Fassetta et al, 2010;Gillings, 1995), irrigation (Harrower, 2009;Harrower, 2010), or land-use potential (Bolten et al, 2006). Since current maps and datasets represent water sources in their present form (the vast majority of the streams in Europe were regulated and modified in 20th century), their usage in spatial analysis in archaeology is limited.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%